Morimoto Hideki, Shibata Yoshiyuki, Morita Kotaro, Kayashima Kotaro, Mori Koji
Morimoto Occupational Health Physician Office.
Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Science University of Occupational and Environmental Health.
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Jan 25;62(1):13-24. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-007-E. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in the field of occupational mental health. However, little attention has been paid to the involvement of LSSAs in this field. This study investigated the occupational mental health competencies that are expected of LSSAs.
Our investigation utilized the Delphi method. In Step 1, we conducted semi-structured interviews with LSSAs and then created an initial list of competencies based on the interviews and a previous investigation. In Step 2, we recruited LSSAs with 10 or more cases related to occupational mental health. They completed a questionnaire assessing the importance of their work (how important they felt it was to conduct work related to mental health) and level of achievement (how much they felt they had achieved). The respondents were also asked to provide additional competencies (not listed on the questionnaire) if they regarded them as necessary for their work, and these were later added to the list of proposed competencies. In Step 3, we presented the results of Step 2 to the same respondents and asked them to rate their agreement with the proposed competencies. Items with agreement of 80% or higher were set as competencies. We also asked LSSAs about the level of importance of their work and their perceived level of achievement with regard to the additional items created in Step 2. Items for which the level of achievement fell below the median were extracted even if the level of importance of the work fell at or above the median.
We recruited 8 LSSAs in Step 1 and created a list of 68 preliminary competencies in 20 fields. We recruited 57 LSSAs in Step 2, and 45 LSSAs completed the survey (response rate: 78.9%). Seven competencies were added to the list as a result. We recruited 34 LSSAs in Step 3 (response rate: 75.6%) . Two items with an agreement rate of less than 80% were removed, resulting in 73 competencies in 20 fields. One of the items with an agreement rate of 100% was "The plan is based on the merits and disadvantages (risks) for both labor and management."
This study identified the competencies required of LSSAs in the field of occupational mental health. Our findings suggest that specifying these competencies will enable efficient training of LSSAs.
劳动和社会保障律师(LSSAs)参与职业心理健康领域的工作。然而,LSSAs在该领域的参与情况鲜受关注。本研究调查了对LSSAs所期望的职业心理健康能力。
我们的调查采用德尔菲法。第一步,我们对LSSAs进行了半结构化访谈,然后根据访谈内容和先前的一项调查创建了一份初始能力清单。第二步,我们招募了处理过10个或更多与职业心理健康相关案件的LSSAs。他们完成了一份问卷,评估其工作的重要性(他们认为开展与心理健康相关工作有多重要)和成就水平(他们觉得自己取得了多大成就)。还要求受访者提供他们认为工作中必要的其他能力(问卷中未列出),这些后来被添加到拟议的能力清单中。第三步,我们将第二步的结果呈现给相同的受访者,要求他们对拟议的能力进行同意程度评分。同意率达到80%或更高的项目被设定为能力。我们还询问了LSSAs关于他们工作的重要性水平以及他们对第二步中新增项目的感知成就水平。即使工作重要性水平处于或高于中位数,成就水平低于中位数的项目也被提取出来。
第一步我们招募了8名LSSAs,并创建了一份包含20个领域68项初步能力的清单。第二步我们招募了57名LSSAs,45名LSSAs完成了调查(回复率:78.9%)。结果有7项能力被添加到清单中。第三步我们招募了34名LSSAs(回复率:75.6%)。两项同意率低于80%的项目被删除,最终得到20个领域的73项能力。同意率为100%的项目之一是“该计划基于劳资双方的优缺点(风险)”。
本研究确定了职业心理健康领域对LSSAs的能力要求。我们的研究结果表明,明确这些能力将有助于对LSSAs进行高效培训。