Suppr超能文献

医学生在线学习行为与学习成果的关联:大规模使用数据分析

Association of Online Learning Behavior and Learning Outcomes for Medical Students: Large-Scale Usage Data Analysis.

作者信息

Bientzle Martina, Hircin Emrah, Kimmerle Joachim, Knipfer Christian, Smeets Ralf, Gaudin Robert, Holtz Peter

机构信息

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (Knowledge Media Research Center), Tübingen, Germany.

AMBOSS GmbH, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Aug 21;5(2):e13529. doi: 10.2196/13529.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital learning environments have become very common in the training of medical professionals, and students often use such platforms for exam preparation. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a common format in medical exams and are used by students to prepare for said exams.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine whether particular learning activities contributed more strongly than others to users' exam performance.

METHODS

We analyzed data from users of an online platform that provides learning materials for medical students in preparation for their final exams. We analyzed whether the number of learning cards viewed and the number of MCQs taken were positively related to learning outcomes. We also examined whether viewing learning cards or answering MCQs was more effective. Finally, we tested whether taking individual notes predicted learning outcomes, and whether taking notes had an effect after controlling for the effects of learning cards and MCQs. Our analyses from the online platform Amboss are based on user activity data, which supplied the number of learning cards studied and test questions answered. We also included the number of notes from each of those 23,633 users who had studied at least 200 learning cards and had answered at least 1000 test exam questions in the 180 days before their state exam. The activity data for this analysis was collected retrospectively, using Amboss archival usage data from April 2014 to April 2017. Learning outcomes were measured using the final state exam scores that were calculated by using the answers voluntarily entered by the participants.

RESULTS

We found correlations between the number of cards studied (r=.22; P<.001) and the number of test questions that had been answered (r=.23; P<.001) with the percentage of correct answers in the learners' medical exams. The number of test questions answered still yielded a significant effect, even after controlling for the number of learning cards studied using a hierarchical regression analysis (β=.14; P<.001; ΔR=.017; P<.001). We found a negative interaction between the number of learning cards and MCQs, indicating that users with high scores for learning cards and MCQs had the highest exam scores. Those 8040 participants who had taken at least one note had a higher percentage of correct answers (80.94%; SD=7.44) than those who had not taken any notes (78.73%; SD=7.80; t=20.95; P<.001). In a stepwise regression, the number of notes the participants had taken predicted the percentage of correct answers over and above the effect of the number of learning cards studied and of the number of test questions entered in step one (β=.06; P<.001; ΔR=.004; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that online learning platforms are particularly helpful whenever learners engage in active elaboration in learning material, such as by answering MCQs or taking notes.

摘要

背景

数字学习环境在医学专业人员培训中已非常普遍,学生经常使用此类平台备考。多项选择题(MCQs)是医学考试中的常见题型,学生用其备考。

目的

我们旨在研究特定学习活动对用户考试成绩的贡献是否比其他活动更强。

方法

我们分析了一个在线平台用户的数据,该平台为医学生提供备考期末考试的学习材料。我们分析了查看学习卡片的数量和做的多项选择题数量是否与学习成果呈正相关。我们还研究了查看学习卡片或回答多项选择题哪种更有效。最后,我们测试了做个人笔记是否能预测学习成果,以及在控制学习卡片和多项选择题的影响后做笔记是否有效果。我们基于在线平台Amboss的分析是基于用户活动数据,这些数据提供了学习的学习卡片数量和回答的测试问题数量。我们还纳入了在州考之前180天内学习至少200张学习卡片且回答至少1000道测试题的23633名用户的笔记数量。此分析的活动数据是回顾性收集的,使用了2014年4月至2017年4月的Amboss存档使用数据。学习成果通过使用参与者自愿输入的答案计算出的最终州考成绩来衡量。

结果

我们发现学习的卡片数量(r = 0.22;P < 0.001)和回答的测试问题数量(r = 0.23;P < 0.001)与学习者医学考试中的正确答案百分比之间存在相关性。即使在使用分层回归分析控制了学习的卡片数量后,回答的测试问题数量仍产生显著影响(β = 0.14;P < 0.001;ΔR = 0.017;P < 0.001)。我们发现学习卡片数量和多项选择题数量之间存在负向交互作用,表明学习卡片和多项选择题得分高的用户考试成绩最高。那些至少做了一条笔记的8040名参与者的正确答案百分比(80.94%;标准差 = 7.44)高于未做任何笔记的参与者(78.73%;标准差 = 7.80;t = 20.95;P < 0.001)。在逐步回归中,参与者做的笔记数量在第一步中学习的学习卡片数量和输入的测试问题数量的影响之上,预测了正确答案的百分比(β = 0.06;P < 0.001;ΔR = 0.004;P < 0.001)。

结论

这些结果表明,只要学习者积极钻研学习材料,如回答多项选择题或做笔记,在线学习平台就特别有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987b/6724501/213cf58ea9f9/mededu_v5i2e13529_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验