• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应性电子学习环境对卫生专业人员和学生的知识、能力及行为的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析方案

Effectiveness of Adaptive E-Learning Environments on Knowledge, Competence, and Behavior in Health Professionals and Students: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Fontaine Guillaume, Cossette Sylvie, Maheu-Cadotte Marc-André, Mailhot Tanya, Deschênes Marie-France, Mathieu-Dupuis Gabrielle

机构信息

Montreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jul 5;6(7):e128. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8085.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.8085
PMID:28679491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5517824/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide tailored instruction by adapting content, navigation, presentation, multimedia, and tools to each user's navigation behavior, individual objectives, knowledge, and preferences. AEEs can have various levels of complexity, ranging from systems using a simple adaptive functionality to systems using artificial intelligence. While AEEs are promising, their effectiveness for the education of health professionals and health professions students remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of AEEs in improving knowledge, competence, and behavior in health professionals and students.

METHODS

We will follow the Cochrane Collaboration and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group guidelines on systematic review methodology. A systematic search of the literature will be conducted in 6 bibliographic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science) using the concepts "adaptive e-learning environments," "health professionals/students," and "effects on knowledge/skills/behavior." We will include randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, in addition to controlled before-after, interrupted time series, and repeated measures studies published between 2005 and 2017. The title and the abstract of each study followed by a full-text assessment of potentially eligible studies will be independently screened by 2 review authors. Using the EPOC extraction form, 1 review author will conduct data extraction and a second author will validate the data extraction. The methodological quality of included studies will be independently assessed by 2 review authors using the EPOC risk of bias criteria. Included studies will be synthesized by a descriptive analysis. Where appropriate, data will be pooled using meta-analysis by applying the RevMan software version 5.1, considering the heterogeneity of studies.

RESULTS

The review is in progress. We plan to submit the results in the beginning of 2018.

CONCLUSION

Providing tailored instruction to health professionals and students is a priority in order to optimize learning and clinical outcomes. This systematic review will synthesize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of AEEs in improving knowledge, competence, and behavior in health professionals and students. It will provide guidance to policy makers, hospital managers, and researchers in terms of AEE development, implementation, and evaluation in health care.

摘要

背景

自适应电子学习环境(AEE)可以通过根据每个用户的导航行为、个人目标、知识和偏好来调整内容、导航、呈现方式、多媒体和工具,从而提供量身定制的指导。AEE可以具有不同程度的复杂性,从使用简单自适应功能的系统到使用人工智能的系统。虽然AEE前景广阔,但其对卫生专业人员和卫生专业学生教育的有效性仍不明确。

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估AEE在提高卫生专业人员和学生的知识、能力和行为方面的有效性。

方法

我们将遵循Cochrane协作网以及有效实践与护理组织(EPOC)小组关于系统评价方法的指南。将在6个文献数据库(CINAHL、EMBASE、ERIC、PsycINFO、PubMed和Web of Science)中使用“自适应电子学习环境”、“卫生专业人员/学生”以及“对知识/技能/行为的影响”等概念对文献进行系统检索。我们将纳入随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,以及2005年至2017年间发表的前后对照、中断时间序列和重复测量研究。每项研究的标题和摘要,随后对潜在符合条件的研究进行全文评估,将由2名综述作者独立筛选。使用EPOC提取表,1名综述作者将进行数据提取,另一名作者将对数据提取进行验证。纳入研究的方法学质量将由2名综述作者使用EPOC偏倚风险标准独立评估。纳入研究将通过描述性分析进行综合。在适当情况下,将使用RevMan软件5.1版通过荟萃分析汇总数据,同时考虑研究的异质性。

结果

本综述正在进行中。我们计划在2018年初提交结果。

结论

为卫生专业人员和学生提供量身定制的指导是优化学习和临床结果的优先事项。本系统评价将综合关于AEE在提高卫生专业人员和学生的知识、能力和行为方面有效性的最佳现有证据。它将在AEE在医疗保健中的开发、实施和评估方面为政策制定者、医院管理人员和研究人员提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6284/5517824/7cef7e4e7244/resprot_v6i7e128_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6284/5517824/7cef7e4e7244/resprot_v6i7e128_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6284/5517824/7cef7e4e7244/resprot_v6i7e128_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Adaptive E-Learning Environments on Knowledge, Competence, and Behavior in Health Professionals and Students: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.适应性电子学习环境对卫生专业人员和学生的知识、能力及行为的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jul 5;6(7):e128. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8085.
2
Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自适应电子学习对卫生专业人员和学生的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e025252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments.本科卫生专业教育中的跨专业能力评估:系统评价自我报告工具的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;9(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01394-7.
9
Effect of implementation interventions on nurses' behaviour in clinical practice: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression protocol.实施干预措施对护士临床行为影响的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归方案
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 5;8(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1227-x.
10
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Moderate-to-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity Among Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康干预措施对心脏康复患者中中等至剧烈强度体力活动的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 29;25:e42845. doi: 10.2196/42845.
2
Improving practicing nurses' knowledge of the cognitive impairment, continence, and mobility needs of older people.提高执业护士对老年人认知障碍、 incontinence(尿失禁)和活动能力需求的认识。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2023 Mar 24;20(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2022-0130. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.
3
Awakening Canadians to ageism: a study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Conventional vs. e-learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.护理教育中的传统教学与电子学习:系统评价与荟萃分析
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Adaptive eLearning modules for cytopathology education: A review and approach.用于细胞病理学教育的自适应电子学习模块:综述与方法
Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Nov;44(11):944-951. doi: 10.1002/dc.23558. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: A systematic review.
唤醒加拿大人对年龄歧视的认识:一项研究方案。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Oct 9;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00713-0.
4
Development of a Novel Interactive Multimedia E-Learning Model to Enhance Clinical Competency Training and Quality of Care among Medical Students.开发一种新型交互式多媒体电子学习模型,以提高医学生的临床能力培训和护理质量。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;8(4):500. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040500.
5
Evaluation of Adaptive Feedback in a Smartphone-Based Game on Health Care Providers' Learning Gain: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于智能手机游戏的适应性反馈对医疗保健提供者学习收获的评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e17100. doi: 10.2196/17100.
6
A Web-Based Tailored Intervention to Support Illness Management in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Pilot Study.一项基于网络的量身定制干预措施以支持急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疾病管理:试点研究
JMIR Cardio. 2017 Sep 6;1(2):e4. doi: 10.2196/cardio.7342.
7
Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自适应电子学习对卫生专业人员和学生的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e025252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252.
8
Association of Online Learning Behavior and Learning Outcomes for Medical Students: Large-Scale Usage Data Analysis.医学生在线学习行为与学习成果的关联:大规模使用数据分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Aug 21;5(2):e13529. doi: 10.2196/13529.
9
Evaluation of Adaptive Feedback in a Smartphone-Based Serious Game on Health Care Providers' Knowledge Gain in Neonatal Emergency Care: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于智能手机的严肃游戏中适应性反馈对医疗保健提供者新生儿急救知识获取的评估:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 26;8(7):e13034. doi: 10.2196/13034.
10
A 9-Step Theory- and Evidence-Based Postgraduate Medical Digital Education Development Model: Empirical Development and Validation.一种基于理论和证据的九步研究生医学数字教育发展模式:实证开发与验证
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Jul 22;5(2):e13004. doi: 10.2196/13004.
基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 May;57:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
5
Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.在线电子学习在健康专业本科生中的应用:对知识、技能、态度和满意度影响的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406.
6
Impact of e-learning on nurses' and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.电子学习对护士和护生知识、技能和满意度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
7
Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.技术增强型模拟在卫生专业教育中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234.
8
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.面向新世纪的卫生专业人员:变革教育,以加强相互依存世界中的卫生系统。
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
9
What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions.我们所说的基于网络的学习是什么意思?干预措施变异性的系统评价。
Med Educ. 2010 Aug;44(8):765-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03723.x.
10
Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于互联网的健康职业教育学习中的教学设计变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):909-22. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319.