Baba Satoshi, Matsumoto Yoshihiro, Tomari Shinji, Yasuhara Takahiro, Saiwai Hirokazu, Matsushita Akinobu, Yufu Tatsuya, Hayashida Mitsumasa, Okada Seiji, Kawaguchi Kenichi, Seo Kenichi, Ito Yasumasa, Nakashima Yasuharu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka Red Cross Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Mar 15;2(3):202-209. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0068. eCollection 2018.
Several reports have demonstrated the surgical treatment strategy for patients with dialysis-associated spondylosis in the cervical spine (CDAS) with destructive spondyloarthropathy (DSA). However, studies focusing on the clinical outcome of patients with CDAS without DSA remain scarce. We aimed to review the treatment strategy of patients with CDAS but without DSA.
The clinical data and surgical records of consecutive patients with CDAS without DSA (n = 9; D-group) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) (n = 30; C-group) who underwent modified double-door laminoplasty(DDL) were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated four radiologic factors in the pre-and postoperative periods that have been reported to be the risk factors for worsening of clinical symptoms in various studies and examined statistical comparison between the D and C groups.
In the D group, the pre- versus postoperative C2-C7 sagittal angles were not significantly different, and only two patients (22%) had kyphosis postoperatively. There was a significant difference in the pre- and postoperative C2-C7 angles in the two groups (P = 0.031). Regarding the change in segmental alignment, the local open angle increased at the C4/C5 level in the D group. Also there was a significant difference in the local angles between the two groups at C4/5 and C5/6 (P = 0.00038, and 0.037), suggesting that postoperative segmental mobility at C4/5 and C5/6 was higher in the D group than in the C group.
In the present study, DDL in patients with CDAS without DSA did not adversely affect the postoperative alignment and stability compared with CSM patients with CSM. However, patients in the D group may have a chance to develop DSA change at the C4/5 level in the future, and careful long-term follow-up is warranted.
多项报告阐述了针对伴有破坏性脊椎关节病(DSA)的颈椎透析相关性脊椎病(CDAS)患者的手术治疗策略。然而,针对无DSA的CDAS患者临床结局的研究仍然较少。我们旨在回顾无DSA的CDAS患者的治疗策略。
回顾性分析连续接受改良双开门椎板成形术(DDL)的无DSA的CDAS患者(n = 9;D组)和脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)患者(n = 30;C组)的临床资料和手术记录。我们调查了术前和术后的四个放射学因素,这些因素在各种研究中被报道为临床症状恶化的危险因素,并对D组和C组进行了统计学比较。
在D组中,术前与术后C2-C7矢状角无显著差异,仅有两名患者(22%)术后出现后凸畸形。两组术前和术后C2-C7角存在显著差异(P = 0.031)。关于节段性排列变化,D组C4/C5水平的局部开口角增加。两组在C4/5和C5/6水平的局部角度也存在显著差异(P = 0.00038和0.037),表明D组术后C4/5和C5/6节段的活动度高于C组。
在本研究中,与CSM患者相比,无DSA的CDAS患者行DDL对术后排列和稳定性没有不利影响。然而,D组患者未来可能有机会在C4/5水平发生DSA改变,因此有必要进行仔细的长期随访。