• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无法言说的事物:语言和视觉注意力捕获如何相互作用。

Whereof one cannot speak: How language and capture of visual attention interact.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.

Department of Linguistics and Asian/Middle-Eastern Languages, San Diego State University, United States; Faculty of Philological and Cultural Studies, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104023. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104023. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104023
PMID:31445296
Abstract

Our research addresses the important question whether language influences cognition by studying crosslinguistic differences in nonlinguistic visual search tasks. We investigated whether capture of visual attention is mediated by characteristics corresponding to concepts that are differently expressed across different languages. Korean grammatically distinguishes between tight- (kkita) and loose-fit (nehta) containment whereas German collapses them into a single semantic category (in). Although linguistic processing was neither instructed nor necessary to perform the visual search task, we found that Korean speakers showed attention capture by non-instructed but target-coincident (Experiment 1) or distractor-coincident (Experiments 4 and 5) spatial fitness of the stimuli, whereas German speakers were not sensitive to it. As the tight- versus loose-fit distinction is grammaticalized only in the Korean but not the German language, our results demonstrate that language influences which visual features capture attention even in non-linguistic tasks that do not require paying attention to these features. In separate control experiments (Experiments 2 and 3), we ruled out cultural or general cognitive group differences between Korean and German speaking participants as alternative explanations. We outline the mechanisms underlying these crosslinguistic differences in nonlinguistic visual search behaviors. This is the first study showing that linguistic spatial relational concepts held in long-term memory can affect attention capture in visual search tasks.

摘要

我们的研究通过研究非语言视觉搜索任务中的跨语言差异,解决了语言是否通过影响认知的重要问题。我们调查了视觉注意力的捕获是否通过与不同语言中不同表达的概念相对应的特征来介导。韩语在语法上区分紧密(kkita)和宽松(nehta)的包容关系,而德语则将它们合并为一个单一的语义类别(in)。尽管在进行视觉搜索任务时既没有指示也不需要进行语言处理,但我们发现,韩语使用者表现出对非指令但与目标一致(实验 1)或与分心物一致(实验 4 和 5)的刺激的空间适应性的注意力捕获,而德语使用者对此则不敏感。由于只有在韩语中而不是在德语中语法化了紧密-宽松区分,我们的结果表明,语言甚至在不需要注意这些特征的非语言任务中影响了哪些视觉特征可以捕获注意力。在单独的控制实验(实验 2 和 3)中,我们排除了韩语和德语使用者之间的文化或一般认知群体差异作为替代解释。我们概述了这些非语言视觉搜索行为中的跨语言差异的潜在机制。这是第一项表明长期记忆中的语言空间关系概念可以影响视觉搜索任务中注意力捕获的研究。

相似文献

1
Whereof one cannot speak: How language and capture of visual attention interact.无法言说的事物:语言和视觉注意力捕获如何相互作用。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104023. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104023. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
2
Does language rule perception? Testing a radical view of linguistic relativity.语言决定认知吗?检验一种关于语言相对论的激进观点。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):794-824. doi: 10.1037/xge0001296. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Effects of Language Background on Gaze Behavior: A Crosslinguistic Comparison Between Korean and German Speakers.语言背景对注视行为的影响:韩语和德语使用者的跨语言比较
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Dec 31;13(4):267-279. doi: 10.5709/acp-0227-z. eCollection 2017.
4
Spatial Semantics, Cognition, and Their Interaction: A Comparative Study of Spatial Categorization in English and Korean.空间语义学、认知及其相互作用:英语和韩语空间范畴的比较研究
Cogn Sci. 2018 May 22. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12622.
5
On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception.在通往某处的道路上:脑电活动反映语言对运动事件感知的影响
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults.理解空间关系:灵活的婴儿,有语言能力的成年人。
Cogn Psychol. 2003 May;46(3):229-59. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00514-5.
7
Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.说不同语言的人对视觉世界的处理方式不同。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):539-50. doi: 10.1037/xge0000075.
8
Revisiting the role of language in spatial cognition: Categorical perception of spatial relations in English and Korean speakers.重新审视语言在空间认知中的作用:英语和韩语使用者对空间关系的范畴知觉。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):2031-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1268-x.
9
Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features.使用眼动特征对视觉和语言任务进行分类。
J Vis. 2014 Mar 7;14(3):11. doi: 10.1167/14.3.11.
10
Does direction matter? Linguistic asymmetries reflected in visual attention.方向是否重要?视觉注意力中反映出的语言不对称性。
Cognition. 2019 Apr;185:91-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.006. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Font Matters: Deciphering the Impact of Font Types on Attention and Working Memory.字体问题:解读字体类型对注意力和工作记忆的影响。
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59845. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Contingent capture by color is sensitive to categorical color perception.颜色的偶然性捕获对类别颜色感知敏感。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):36-48. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02806-1. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Natural Language Processing Markers for Psychosis and Other Psychiatric Disorders: Emerging Themes and Research Agenda From a Cross-Linguistic Workshop.
自然语言处理标记在精神病和其他精神障碍中的应用:跨语言研讨会的新兴主题和研究议程。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 22;49(Suppl_2):S86-S92. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac215.
4
Linguistic Skill and Stimulus-Driven Attention: A Case for Linguistic Relativity.语言技能与刺激驱动的注意力:语言相对论的一个例证
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:875744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875744. eCollection 2022.
5
Procedural Control Versus Resources as Potential Origins of Human Hyper Selectivity.程序控制与资源作为人类超选择性潜在起源的比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 26;12:718141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718141. eCollection 2021.