• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰普通老年人群体中志愿者功能量表(VFI)的翻译和验证。

Translation and Validation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) among the General Dutch Older Population.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, PO Box 11650, 2502 AR The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 26;16(17):3106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173106.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16173106
PMID:31455027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6747180/
Abstract

Improvement of volunteering rates in the Netherlands is important because increased productivity among older adults would contribute to societal sustainability in the light of population aging. Therefore, a better understanding of volunteer motivations of Dutch older adults is needed. The Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) for assessing volunteer motivations has good psychometric properties and is adapted to several languages, but no validated Dutch translation yet exists. The aim of the current study is to validate the VFI for use in the Dutch older population (60 years and over). The Dutch-translated VFI (6 scales, 30 items) is included in the Lifelines 'Daily Activities and Leisure Activities add-on Study', which was distributed among participants aged 60 to 80. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) are performed to assess the validity of the translated VFI. Internal consistency is assessed by computing Cronbach's 's. Results of the EFA ( = 4208) point towards a six-factor solution with a nearly perfectly clean structure. Deletion of three problematic items results in a clean factor structure. CFA results indicate moderate model fit (RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.89). Cronbach's 's (0.78 to 0.85) indicate good internal consistency. Goodness-of-fit indices are sufficient and comparable to those obtained in the validation of the original VFI. The current study provides support for use of the Dutch-translation of the VFI (6 scales, 27 items) to assess volunteer motivations among Dutch volunteers aged 60 years and over.

摘要

提高荷兰的志愿服务率很重要,因为老年人的生产力提高将有助于人口老龄化背景下的社会可持续性。因此,需要更好地了解荷兰老年人的志愿服务动机。评估志愿服务动机的《志愿者功能清单》(VFI)具有良好的心理测量学特性,并适用于多种语言,但尚未有经过验证的荷兰语翻译版本。本研究的目的是验证 VFI 在荷兰老年人群体(60 岁及以上)中的适用性。该研究纳入了 Lifelines“日常活动和休闲活动附加研究”的参与者,这些参与者年龄在 60 至 80 岁之间,参与者填写了包含 6 个量表、30 个项目的荷兰语翻译版 VFI。该研究采用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估翻译后 VFI 的有效性。通过计算 Cronbach's 's 来评估内部一致性。EFA 的结果(n = 4208)表明存在六因子解,且具有几乎完美的干净结构。删除三个有问题的项目后,因子结构更加干净。CFA 结果表明模型拟合度中等(RMSEA = 0.06,CFI = 0.90,TLI = 0.89)。Cronbach's 's(0.78 至 0.85)表明内部一致性良好。拟合度指标良好,与原始 VFI 的验证结果相当。本研究为使用荷兰语翻译的 VFI(6 个量表,27 个项目)评估荷兰 60 岁及以上志愿者的志愿服务动机提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Translation and Validation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) among the General Dutch Older Population.荷兰普通老年人群体中志愿者功能量表(VFI)的翻译和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 26;16(17):3106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173106.
2
The Dutch Comparative Scale for Assessing Volunteer Motivations among Volunteers and Non-Volunteers: An Adaptation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory.荷兰评估志愿者和非志愿者动机的比较量表:对志愿者功能清单的改编。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245047.
3
The Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI): Adaptation and Psychometric Properties among a Portuguese Sample of Volunteers.志愿者功能量表(VFI):葡萄牙志愿者样本中的适应性和心理测量特性。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 25;14(4):823-837. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14040053.
4
Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach.理解和评估志愿者的动机:一种功能主义方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1516-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1516.
5
Translation and validation of the Dutch Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale for older adults.中文译文:老年人荷兰匹兹堡疲劳量表的翻译和验证。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01630-8.
6
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
7
Cross-cultural validation of the motivation to change lifestyle and health behaviours for dementia risk reduction scale in the Dutch general population.跨文化验证生活方式改变和降低痴呆风险行为的动机量表在荷兰普通人群中的适用性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08737-y.
8
The psychometric validation of the Dutch version of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) after traumatic brain injury (TBI).创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后荷兰版 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)的心理测量验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0210138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210138. eCollection 2019.
9
Why mentor? A validation study of the volunteer functions inventory for use in youth mentoring.为什么要做导师?志愿者职能清单在青年导师制中的应用验证研究。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):1040-1058. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22326. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI-NL).荷兰版癌症复发恐惧量表(FCRI-NL)的翻译与验证
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Nov;102:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI): Adaptation and Psychometric Properties among a Portuguese Sample of Volunteers.志愿者功能量表(VFI):葡萄牙志愿者样本中的适应性和心理测量特性。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 25;14(4):823-837. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14040053.
2
Reliability, Validity, and Transcultural Adaptation of New Persian Version of Celiac Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire.乳糜泻生活质量问卷新波斯语版本的信度、效度及跨文化调适
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023 Apr;15(2):126-132. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2023.331. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
3
Understanding volunteer motivations and concerns in coaching and officiating basketball: implications for sport policy.理解篮球教练和裁判志愿者的动机和关注点:对体育政策的启示。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 25;23(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15949-5.
4
Protective Factors in Resilient Volunteers Facing Compassion Fatigue.面对职业耗竭的韧性志愿者的保护因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051769.
5
The Dutch Comparative Scale for Assessing Volunteer Motivations among Volunteers and Non-Volunteers: An Adaptation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory.荷兰评估志愿者和非志愿者动机的比较量表:对志愿者功能清单的改编。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245047.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of participation in voluntary work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.参与志愿工作的决定因素:纵向队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 2;18(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6077-2.
2
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI:他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
3
Volunteer Functions Inventory: A systematic review.志愿者功能清单:系统评价。
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):306-316. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.371.
4
Representativeness of the LifeLines Cohort Study.生命线队列研究的代表性。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137203. eCollection 2015.
5
Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank.队列简介:生命线,一项三代队列研究及生物样本库。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1172-80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu229. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
6
The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: a critical review and recommendations for future research.老年人志愿服务的相关益处:批判性回顾与未来研究建议。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1505-33. doi: 10.1037/a0037610. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers.志愿服务是一种公共卫生干预措施吗?对志愿者健康与生存状况的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:773. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-773.
8
Volunteering by older adults and risk of mortality: a meta-analysis.老年人志愿服务与死亡率风险:荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Jun;28(2):564-77. doi: 10.1037/a0031519. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
9
Dynamics of volunteering in older Europeans.老年人志愿服务的动态。
Gerontologist. 2010 Apr;50(2):170-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp122. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
10
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.自我报告测量工具跨文化适应过程指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.