Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):306-316. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.371.
The objective of this research study was to conduct a systematic review of the research on volunteers using Clary et al.’s VFI (1998). A total of 48 research studies including 67 independent samples met eligibility criteria. The total sample of the studies analyzed ranged from 20375 to 21988 participants, depending on the motivation analyzed. The results show that the Values factor obtained the highest mean score, both overall and in each type of volunteering, whereas the lowest scores were for the Career and Enhancement factors. Studies conducted with samples with a mean age under 40 years obtain higher scores on Career and Understanding scales when compared to studies in older samples. The group of studies with less than 50% women yield higher mean scores on the Social scale than studies with more than 50% women in the sample. All the scales show reliability coefficients between .78 and .84. Only eight of the articles provide data on the reliability of the scale with a mean value of .90. Of the 26 studies that performed factor analysis, 18 confirmed the original structure of six factors.
本研究旨在对志愿者进行系统评价，采用 Clary 等人的 VFI（1998 年）进行分析。共有 48 项研究，包含 67 个独立样本，符合纳入标准。分析中研究的总样本范围为 20375 至 21988 名参与者，具体取决于分析的动机。结果表明，价值观因素在整体和每种志愿服务类型中得分最高，而职业和提升因素得分最低。与年龄较大的样本相比，针对平均年龄低于 40 岁的样本进行的研究，在职业和理解量表上获得的分数更高。女性比例低于 50%的研究组在社会量表上的平均得分高于女性比例超过 50%的研究组。所有量表的信度系数在 0.78 至 0.84 之间。只有 8 篇文章提供了关于量表可靠性的数据，均值为 0.90。在进行因素分析的 26 项研究中，有 18 项研究证实了最初的六因素结构。
