• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《中文版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)在学龄前哮喘儿童中的信度和效度:一项前瞻性验证研究》。

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) in preschool children with asthma: a prospective validation study.

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Respiratory Medicine, Nanjing Children's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e025378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025378.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025378
PMID:31455696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6720147/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The limited existing asthma control questionnaires that are available for children 5 years of age or younger in China mostly assess only the impairment domain of asthma control. Here, the English version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) was translated into Chinese and validated for its application in asthma control in preschool children.

DESIGN

Prospective validation study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 321 Chinese preschool children suffering from asthma completed the study from December 2017 to February 2018.

METHOD

The TRACK translation into Chinese employed the translation and back translation technique. The caregivers of the preschool children with asthma symptoms completed TRACK during two clinical visits over 4-6 weeks. Moreover, the physicians completed a Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-based asthma control survey at both visits. The utility of TRACK for assessing the change in asthma control status and its reliability and discriminant validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of TRACK showed internal consistency reliability values of 0.63 and 0.71 at each visit, respectively (Cronbach's α). The test-retest reliability was 0.62 for individuals whose GINA-based assessment results were the same at both visits (n=206). The TRACK scores for the children in the various asthma control categories were significantly different (p<0.001). Children recommended for increased treatment by the physicians had lower TRACK scores than those recommended for no change in treatment or decreased treatment (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study verifies the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of TRACK. Changes in the TRACK scores effectively reflected the level of asthma control in preschool children and guided further treatment strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02649803.

摘要

目的

在中国,现有的适用于 5 岁及以下儿童的有限哮喘控制问卷大多仅评估哮喘控制的损害领域。在此,将英文版的儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)翻译成中文,并对其在学龄前儿童哮喘控制中的应用进行验证。

设计

前瞻性验证研究。

地点和参与者

共有 321 名患有哮喘的中国学龄前儿童参加了这项研究,研究时间为 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 2 月。

方法

TRACK 中文翻译采用了翻译和回译技术。在 4-6 周的两次临床就诊期间,哮喘症状的学龄前儿童的照顾者完成了 TRACK。此外,医生在两次就诊时均完成了基于全球哮喘倡议(GINA)的哮喘控制调查。评估了 TRACK 评估哮喘控制状况变化的能力及其可靠性和判别有效性。

结果

中文版 TRACK 在每次就诊时的内部一致性可靠性值分别为 0.63 和 0.71(Cronbach's α)。两次就诊时 GINA 评估结果相同的个体的测试-重测可靠性为 0.62(n=206)。在不同哮喘控制类别的儿童中,TRACK 评分存在显著差异(p<0.001)。医生建议增加治疗的儿童的 TRACK 评分低于建议维持治疗或减少治疗的儿童(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究验证了中文版 TRACK 的有效性和可靠性。TRACK 评分的变化有效反映了学龄前儿童哮喘控制水平,并指导了进一步的治疗策略。

试验注册号

NCT02649803。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) in preschool children with asthma: a prospective validation study.《中文版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)在学龄前哮喘儿童中的信度和效度:一项前瞻性验证研究》。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e025378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025378.
2
Validation of the Spanish version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) in a population of Hispanic preschoolers.西班牙文版儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK)在西班牙裔学龄前儿童群体中的验证。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 May-Jun;2(3):326-31.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
3
Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire.《儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK)》问卷土耳其语版本的验证
J Asthma. 2013 Dec;50(10):1096-101. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.837481. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
4
Longitudinal validation of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids in pediatric practices.《儿科实践中儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试的纵向验证》。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):e737-47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1465. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
The Korean Version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): Reliability and Validity.《儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)》韩文版的信度和效度。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jan 9;34(3):e25. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e25. eCollection 2019 Jan 21.
6
Test for respiratory and asthma control in kids (TRACK): a caregiver-completed questionnaire for preschool-aged children.儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK):一份由照料者填写的针对学龄前儿童的问卷。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Apr;123(4):833-9.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.058.
7
Cross-cultural validation of the Portuguese from Portugal version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire.葡萄牙语版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)问卷的跨文化验证。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Sep;53(5):214-220. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.174. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
8
Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): clinically meaningful changes in score.儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK):评分的临床有意义变化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):983-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
Reliability, validity and developmental sensitivity of the Language Use Inventory (LUI) in the Chinese context.语言运用量表(LUI)在中国背景下的信度、效度及发展敏感性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 May;57(3):497-511. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12693. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): validation of the Portuguese version.儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK):葡萄牙语版本的验证
World Allergy Organ J. 2018 Dec 5;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40413-018-0219-y. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualizing the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale in primary healthcare settings: a validity and reliability evaluation study.在基层医疗环境中对修订后的患者感知以患者为中心量表(PPPC-R)进行语境化:一项有效性和可靠性评估研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 5;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02227-x.
2
The Relationship of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Initial Score on the Prognosis of Pre-school Children With Asthma: A Prospective Cohort Study.儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试初始分数与学龄前哮喘儿童预后的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 30;9:690333. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.690333. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in the United States: Literature Review of Current Evidence.美国儿科哮喘的经济负担:现有证据的文献综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0726-2.
2
Applying UK real-world primary care data to predict asthma attacks in 3776 well-characterised children: a retrospective cohort study.应用英国真实世界初级保健数据预测 3776 名特征明确儿童的哮喘发作:一项回顾性队列研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Jul 23;28(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0095-5.
3
Epidemiology of childhood asthma in mainland China (1988-2014): A meta-analysis.
中国大陆儿童哮喘流行病学(1988 - 2014):一项荟萃分析。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018 May 1;39(3):15-29. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4131.
4
Impact of childhood wheezing on lung function in adulthood: A meta-analysis.儿童喘息对成年后肺功能的影响:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0192390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192390. eCollection 2018.
5
Exacerbation risk and characterisation of the UK's asthma population from infants to old age.从婴儿到老年,英国哮喘人群的恶化风险及特征。
Thorax. 2018 Apr;73(4):313-320. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210650. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Paediatric asthma control under a community management model in China: a protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study.中国社区管理模式下儿科哮喘控制的研究方案:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015741.
7
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines-2016 revision.变应性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA)指南-2016 年修订版。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):950-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Uncontrolled asthma and its risk factors in Chinese children: A cross-sectional observational study.中国儿童未控制哮喘及其危险因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
J Asthma. 2016 Sep;53(7):699-706. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1144199. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error.因子分析中的样本量:模型误差的作用。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Oct 1;36(4):611-37. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06.
10
Parent and child asthma illness representations: a systematic review.父母与儿童对哮喘的疾病认知:一项系统综述
J Asthma. 2016 Jun;53(5):510-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1116088. Epub 2016 Jan 19.