Suppr超能文献

无意识行走。

Walking Without Awareness.

作者信息

Harms Ilse M, van Dijken Joke H, Brookhuis Karel A, de Waard Dick

机构信息

Department Smart Mobility, Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, The Hague, Netherlands.

Department Clinical & Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01846. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Pedestrians are commonly engaged in other activities while walking. The current study assesses (1) whether pedestrians are sufficiently aware of their surroundings to successfully negotiate obstacles in a city, and (2) whether various common walking practices affect awareness of obstacles and, or, avoidance behavior. To this end, an obstacle, i.e., a signboard was placed on a pavement in the city centre of Utrecht, the Netherlands. The behavioral measure consisted of the distance to the signboard before pedestrians moved to avoid it. After passing, participants were interviewed to obtain thought samples, self-reported route familiarity, a confirmation of secondary task engagement, and to assess awareness through recall and recognition of the signboard and its text. In this study 234 pedestrians participated. More than half of the participants (53.8%) was unaware of the signboard, still none of them had bumped into it. Mind wandering, being engaged in secondary tasks such as talking with a companion or using a mobile phone, and being familiar with a route, did not affect awareness nor avoidance behavior. In conclusion, despite being very common there was no evidence that necessarily results in risk. The absence of awareness does not imply any absence of cognitive and perceptual processing. Pedestrians are still capable of successfully avoiding obstacles in their path, even in visually more challenging environments such as a city centre. It is argued that this is because walking consists of highly automated, skilled behavior.

摘要

行人在行走时通常会从事其他活动。当前的研究评估了:(1)行人是否足够了解周围环境,以便在城市中成功避开障碍物;(2)各种常见的行走行为是否会影响对障碍物的察觉以及/或者避让行为。为此,在荷兰乌得勒支市中心的人行道上放置了一个障碍物,即一块招牌。行为测量指标是行人在移动以避开招牌之前与招牌之间的距离。行人通过招牌后,会接受访谈以获取思维样本、自我报告的路线熟悉程度、对从事次要任务的确认,并通过对招牌及其文字的回忆和识别来评估其察觉情况。在这项研究中,有234名行人参与。超过一半的参与者(53.8%)没有察觉到招牌,但他们中没有人撞到招牌。走神、从事诸如与同伴交谈或使用手机等次要任务以及熟悉路线,均未影响察觉情况或避让行为。总之,尽管这种情况非常普遍,但没有证据表明它必然会导致风险。没有察觉到并不意味着没有认知和感知处理过程。即使在诸如市中心这样视觉上更具挑战性的环境中,行人仍然能够成功避开道路上的障碍物。有人认为,这是因为行走是由高度自动化的熟练行为组成的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8579/6700670/738170183d14/fpsyg-10-01846-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验