• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会环境在预防吸烟中的重要性:Dead Cool 干预分析。

The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention.

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.

Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1182. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7
PMID:31462249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6714405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An adolescent's perceptions of their family's and friends' smoking attitudes and behaviour can influence their own uptake of smoking. There are two broad sources of such social influence: observing the behaviour directly, and assimilating attitudes.

METHODS

We analysed data collected for the evaluation of Dead Cool, a school based smoking prevention intervention in Northern Ireland (n=480 in 20 clusters). The main analysis fits three nested logistic regression models predicting pre-intervention susceptibility to taking up smoking, as reflected in responses to three attitudinal questions. Model 1 includes only personal characteristics as explanatory factors. Model 2 adds the behaviour of friends and family that would provide an opportunity for social influence through observational learning. Model 3 adds the susceptibility of friends.

RESULTS

Each additional group of variables improved the model fit (with reduced AIC and BIC). However, in the final model, only three variables were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) in predicting susceptibility to smoking initiation: rebelliousness (OR [1.1,1.3]) from the personal characteristics group; and, in the observational learning group, being friends with a smoker (OR [1.0,2.9]) and frequency of being in the same room or car with someone smoking (OR [2.0,9.0] for most frequent). Adding the two measures of diffusion of susceptibility through the friendship network improved the model fit, but neither was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis provides additional evidence to support policies that could reduce children's exposure to smoking behaviour, and potential subsequent smoking initiation. No conclusions could be drawn about the diffusion of smoking attitudes through the school friendship networks of children.

摘要

背景

青少年对其家庭和朋友吸烟态度和行为的看法会影响他们自己吸烟的倾向。这种社会影响有两个主要来源:直接观察行为和同化态度。

方法

我们分析了在北爱尔兰进行的基于学校的预防吸烟干预项目“Dead Cool”评估中收集的数据(20 个簇,共 480 名参与者)。主要分析拟合了三个嵌套逻辑回归模型,用于预测干预前开始吸烟的易感性,反映在对三个态度问题的回答中。模型 1 仅包括个人特征作为解释因素。模型 2 添加了朋友和家人的行为,这些行为可以通过观察学习提供社会影响的机会。模型 3 添加了朋友的易感性。

结果

每个额外的变量组都改善了模型拟合(降低了 AIC 和 BIC)。然而,在最终模型中,只有三个变量被发现对预测吸烟起始的易感性具有统计学意义(p<0.05):个人特征组中的叛逆(OR [1.1,1.3]);在观察学习组中,与吸烟者为朋友(OR [1.0,2.9])和与吸烟者在同一房间或车内的频率(最频繁时为 OR [2.0,9.0])。添加通过友谊网络扩散易感性的两个测量值提高了模型拟合度,但都没有发现具有统计学意义。

结论

分析结果提供了额外的证据,支持可以减少儿童暴露于吸烟行为并潜在减少后续吸烟起始的政策。对于儿童通过学校友谊网络传播吸烟态度的问题,无法得出结论。

相似文献

1
The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention.社会环境在预防吸烟中的重要性:Dead Cool 干预分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1182. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7.
2
Own and friends' smoking attitudes and social preference as early predictors of adolescent smoking.青少年自身及朋友的吸烟态度和社交偏好作为青少年吸烟的早期预测因素。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Oct;37(4):808-19. doi: 10.1080/15374410802359619.
3
Diffusion of Intervention Effects: The Impact of a Family-Based Substance Use Prevention Program on Friends of Participants.干预效果的扩散:一项基于家庭的物质使用预防计划对参与者朋友的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Oct;57(4):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
4
Exploring the mechanistic pathways of how social network influences social norms in adolescent smoking prevention interventions.探讨社会网络如何影响青少年吸烟预防干预中社会规范的机制途径。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 21;13(1):3017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28161-7.
5
A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools.一项针对英国学校青少年同伴影响、同伴选择和吸烟行为的纵向社会网络分析。
Health Psychol. 2012 Jul;31(4):450-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026876. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
6
Gender differences in friends' influences on adolescent drinking: a genetic epidemiological study.朋友对青少年饮酒影响中的性别差异:一项遗传流行病学研究
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Dec;31(12):2012-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00523.x. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
7
Decomposing the components of friendship and friends' influence on adolescent drinking and smoking.解析友谊的组成部分以及朋友对青少年饮酒和吸烟的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Aug;51(2):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.013. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
8
Where do our children learn to smoke?我们的孩子从哪里学会吸烟的?
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;16(4):178-81. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3488.
9
Smoking behaviours of adolescents, influenced by smoking of teachers, family and friends.青少年的吸烟行为受到教师、家人和朋友吸烟的影响。
Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Jun;61(2):220-7. doi: 10.1111/inr.12084. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
10
Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use.同伴影响:线上和线下友谊网络对青少年吸烟和饮酒行为的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The PHEM-B toolbox of methods for incorporating the influences on Behaviour into Public Health Economic Models.PHEM-B 工具包方法,用于将行为影响纳入公共卫生经济模型。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):2794. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20225-1.
2
Association Between the Location of Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Depressive Symptoms among South Korean Adolescents.二手烟暴露地点与韩国青少年抑郁症状的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):5116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145116.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of peer behavior as a function of social and cultural closeness: A meta-analysis of normative influence on adolescent smoking initiation and continuation.同伴行为影响与社会文化亲近度的关系:规范影响青少年吸烟起始和持续的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Oct;143(10):1082-1115. doi: 10.1037/bul0000113. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
2
Network interventions.网络干预措施。
Science. 2012 Jul 6;337(6090):49-53. doi: 10.1126/science.1217330.
3
Systematic review of social network analysis in adolescent cigarette smoking behavior.系统综述青少年吸烟行为中的社会网络分析。
J Sch Health. 2012 Jan;82(1):21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x.
4
Social influence, intention to smoke, and adolescent smoking behaviour longitudinal relations.社会影响、吸烟意向与青少年吸烟行为的纵向关系。
Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;16(4):779-98. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2010.02014.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
5
Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.暴露于父母和兄弟姐妹吸烟与儿童和青少年吸烟的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorax. 2011 Oct;66(10):847-55. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.153379. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
6
Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: social network analyses in six European countries.青少年友谊网络与吸烟行为的动态关系:六个欧洲国家的社会网络分析
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
7
Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: a theoretical review of the literature.同伴对青少年吸烟的影响:文献的理论综述
Subst Use Misuse. 2006;41(1):103-55. doi: 10.1080/10826080500368892.
8
From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.从社会融合到健康:新千年的涂尔干。
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(6):843-57. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4.
9
Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States.验证易感性作为美国青少年吸烟情况预测指标的有效性。
Health Psychol. 1996 Sep;15(5):355-61. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.5.355.
10
Developing effective behavior change interventions: some lessons learned from behavioral research.
NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;155:246-61.