Faregh Neda, Lencucha Raphael, Ventevogel Peter, Dubale Benyam Worku, Kirmayer Laurence J
1Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada.
6Global Mental Health Program, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Aug 24;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0312-9. eCollection 2019.
Major efforts are underway to improve access to mental health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) including systematic training of non-specialized health professionals and other care providers to identify and help individuals with mental disorders. In many LMIC, this effort is guided by the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) established by the World Health Organization, and commonly centres around one tool in this program: the mhGAP-Intervention Guide.
To identify cultural and contextual challenges in mhGAP training and implementation and potential strategies for mitigation.
An informal consultative approach was used to analyze the authors' combined field experience in the practice of mhGAP implementation and training. We employed iterative thematic analysis to consolidate and refine lessons, challenges and recommendations through multiple drafts. Findings were organized into categories according to specific challenges, lessons learned and recommendations for future practice. We aimed to identify cross-cutting and recurrent issues.
Based on intensive fieldwork experience with a focus on capacity building, we identify six major sets of challenges: (i) cultural differences in explanations of and attitudes toward mental disorder; (ii) the structure of the local health-care system; (iii) the level of supervision and support available post-training; (iv) the level of previous education, knowledge and skills of trainees; (v) the process of recruitment of trainees; and (vi) the larger socio-political context. Approaches to addressing these problems include: (1) cultural and contextual adaptation of training activities, (2) meaningful stakeholder and community engagement, and (3) processes that provide support to trainees, such as ongoing supervision and Communities of Practice.
Contextual and cultural factors present major barriers to mhGAP implementation and sustainability of improved services. To enable trainees to effectively apply their local cultural knowledge, mhGAP training needs to: (1) address assumptions, biases and stigma associated with mental health symptoms and problems; (2) provide an explicit framework to guide the integration of cultural knowledge into assessment, treatment negotiation, and delivery; and (3) address the specific kinds of problems, modes of clinical presentations and social predicaments seen in the local population. Continued research is needed to assess the effectiveness these strategies.
包括对非专业卫生专业人员和其他护理人员进行系统培训,以识别和帮助患有精神障碍的个体在内的诸多努力正在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)展开,以改善心理健康护理的可及性。在许多低收入和中等收入国家,这项工作由世界卫生组织制定的精神卫生差距行动计划(mhGAP)指导,并且通常围绕该计划中的一种工具展开:mhGAP干预指南。
确定mhGAP培训与实施过程中的文化和背景挑战以及潜在的缓解策略。
采用非正式协商方法,分析作者在mhGAP实施与培训实践中的综合实地经验。我们运用迭代主题分析,通过多轮草稿来巩固和完善经验教训、挑战及建议。研究结果根据具体挑战、经验教训以及对未来实践的建议进行分类整理。我们旨在识别贯穿各领域且反复出现的问题。
基于以能力建设为重点的密集实地工作经验,我们确定了六大类挑战:(i)对精神障碍的解释及态度方面的文化差异;(ii)当地卫生保健系统的结构;(iii)培训后可获得的监督与支持水平;(iv)受训人员先前的教育程度、知识和技能水平;(v)受训人员的招募过程;(vi)更大的社会政治背景。解决这些问题的方法包括:(1)对培训活动进行文化和背景适应性调整;(2)让利益相关者和社区进行有意义的参与;(3)为受训人员提供支持的过程,如持续监督和实践社区。
背景和文化因素是mhGAP实施及改善服务可持续性的主要障碍。为使受训人员能够有效运用其当地文化知识,mhGAP培训需要:(1)解决与心理健康症状和问题相关的假设、偏见和污名化问题;(2)提供一个明确的框架,以指导将文化知识融入评估、治疗协商和服务提供过程;(3)解决当地人群中出现的特定类型问题、临床表现模式和社会困境。需要持续开展研究以评估这些策略的有效性。