Suppr超能文献

一项基于技术的同伴支持干预项目预防产后抑郁的评估(第1部分):随机对照试验

Evaluation of a Technology-Based Peer-Support Intervention Program for Preventing Postnatal Depression (Part 1): Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Shorey Shefaly, Chee Cornelia Yin Ing, Ng Esperanza Debby, Lau Ying, Dennis Cindy-Lee, Chan Yiong Huak

机构信息

Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School Of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Psychological Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 29;21(8):e12410. doi: 10.2196/12410.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The frenzy of postbirth events often takes a toll on mothers' mental well-being, leaving them susceptible to postpartum psychological disorders such as postnatal depression (PND). Social support has been found to be effective in restoring the emotional well-being of new mothers. Therefore, mothers need to be supported during the crucial postpartum period to buffer the negative after effects of childbirth and to promote healthier maternal well-being.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a technology-based peer-support intervention program (PIP) on maternal outcomes during the early postpartum period.

METHODS

A randomized, parallel-armed controlled trial was conducted. The study recruited 138 mothers (69 in intervention group, 69 in control group) at risk of PND from a tertiary hospital in Singapore. To support these mothers, 20 peer volunteers were recruited by word of mouth and trained by a psychiatrist in social support skills before the intervention commenced. The 4-week-long intervention included a weekly follow-up with a peer volunteer through phone calls or text messages. The intervention group received peer support in addition to the standard care offered by the hospital. The control group only received postnatal standard care. Maternal outcomes (PND, postnatal anxiety [PNA], loneliness, and perceived social support) were measured with reliable and valid instruments. Data were collected immediately postpartum, at 1 month postpartum and at 3 months postpartum. The general linear model was used to compare the groups for postpartum percentage changes in the outcome variables at first and third months, and the linear mixed model was used to compare the trend over the study period.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores (d=-2.11; 95% CI -4.0 to -0.3; P=.03) between the intervention and control groups at 3 months postpartum after adjusting for covariates. The intervention group had a significant change over time compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The technology-based PIP was found to be effective in reducing the risk of PND among new mothers and showed a generally positive trend in reducing PNA and loneliness and increasing perceived social support. This study highlights the importance of training paraprofessionals to provide needed support for new mothers postpartum. A further long-term evaluation of the PIP on maternal and family outcomes and its cost-effectiveness is needed to inform clinical practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN14864807; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14864807.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.9416.

摘要

背景

产后一系列事件的忙碌常常对母亲的心理健康造成影响,使她们易患产后心理障碍,如产后抑郁症(PND)。研究发现社会支持有助于恢复初为人母者的情绪健康。因此,在产后关键时期需要给予母亲支持,以缓冲分娩带来的负面影响,促进母亲更健康的身心状态。

目的

本研究旨在评估一项基于技术的同伴支持干预项目(PIP)在产后早期对母亲各项结局的有效性。

方法

进行了一项随机、平行组对照试验。该研究从新加坡一家三级医院招募了138名有患PND风险的母亲(干预组69名,对照组69名)。为了支持这些母亲,通过口碑招募了20名同伴志愿者,并在干预开始前由一名精神科医生对其进行社会支持技能培训。为期4周的干预包括每周通过电话或短信与一名同伴志愿者进行随访。干预组除了接受医院提供的标准护理外,还获得同伴支持。对照组仅接受产后标准护理。采用可靠且有效的工具测量母亲的各项结局(PND、产后焦虑[PNA]、孤独感和感知到的社会支持)。在产后即刻、产后1个月和产后3个月收集数据。使用一般线性模型比较两组在产后第1个月和第3个月结局变量的百分比变化,使用线性混合模型比较研究期间的变化趋势。

结果

在对协变量进行调整后,干预组和对照组在产后3个月时的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分存在统计学显著差异(d=-2.11;95%CI -4.0至-0.3;P=.03)。与对照组相比,干预组随时间有显著变化。

结论

发现基于技术的PIP在降低初为人母者患PND的风险方面有效,并且在降低PNA和孤独感以及增加感知到的社会支持方面总体呈现积极趋势。本研究强调了培训辅助专业人员为产后新妈妈提供所需支持的重要性。需要对PIP对母亲和家庭结局及其成本效益进行进一步的长期评估,以为临床实践提供参考。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)ISRCTN14864807;https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):RR2-10.2196/resprot.9416。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3877/6744221/33a5fa4815a4/jmir_v21i8e12410_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验