Suppr超能文献

体力活动行为与“蓝领”工人的久坐行为:计步器研究的系统评价。

Sedentary and Physical Activity Behavior in "Blue-Collar" Workers: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Studies.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2019 Nov 1;16(11):1060-1069. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0607. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This systematic review assessed evidence on the accelerometer-measured sedentary and physical activity (PA) behavior of nonoffice workers in "blue-collar" industries.

METHODS

The databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus were searched up to April 6, 2018. Eligibility criteria were accelerometer-measured sedentary, sitting, and/or PA behaviors in "blue-collar" workers (≥10 participants; agricultural, construction, cleaning, manufacturing, mining, postal, or transport industries). Data on participants' characteristics, study protocols, and measured behaviors during work and/or nonwork time were extracted. Methodologic quality was assessed using a 12-item checklist.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (representing 11 data sets), all from developed world economies, met inclusion criteria. The mean quality score for selected studies was 9.5 (SD 0.8) out of a maximum of 12. Data were analyzed using a range of analytical techniques (eg, accelerometer counts or pattern recognition algorithms). "Blue-collar" workers were more sedentary and less active during nonwork compared with work time (eg, sitting 5.7 vs 3.2 h/d; moderate to vigorous PA 0.5 vs 0.7 h/d). Drivers were the most sedentary (work time 5.1 h/d; nonwork time 8.2 h/d).

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of sedentary time and insufficient PA to offset risk are health issues for "blue-collar" workers. To better inform interventions, research groups need to adopt common measurement and reporting methodologies.

摘要

背景

本系统评价评估了非办公室工作人员“蓝领”行业中使用加速度计测量的久坐和身体活动(PA)行为的证据。

方法

截至 2018 年 4 月 6 日,检索了 CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库。纳入标准为加速度计测量的“蓝领”工人(≥10 名参与者;农业、建筑、清洁、制造、采矿、邮政或运输行业)的久坐、坐姿和/或 PA 行为。提取参与者特征、研究方案以及工作和/或非工作时间内测量行为的数据。使用 12 项检查表评估方法学质量。

结果

20 项研究(代表 11 个数据集)均来自发达经济体,符合纳入标准。选择研究的平均质量得分为 9.5(SD 0.8),满分 12 分。使用各种分析技术(例如,加速度计计数或模式识别算法)分析数据。与工作时间相比,非工作时间“蓝领”工人的久坐时间更长,活动时间更少(例如,坐姿 5.7 小时/天与 3.2 小时/天;中度至剧烈 PA 0.5 小时/天与 0.7 小时/天)。驾驶员的久坐时间最长(工作时间 5.1 小时/天,非工作时间 8.2 小时/天)。

结论

“蓝领”工人久坐时间长,PA 不足以抵消风险,这是健康问题。为了更好地为干预措施提供信息,研究小组需要采用共同的测量和报告方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验