Verma Shikha, Boppana Naveen, Valleri Uday, George Anoj, Shetty Mallikarjun Sajjan
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, India.
Consultant Periodontist, Ministry of Interior, Qatar.
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2017 Jan 2;19(1):22-27.
To evaluate and compare the efficacy of oxalate-containing desensitizer BisBlock™ and glutaraldehyde-containing desensitizer Gluma©.
A subject-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted among 50 adult patients of age ranging from 18 - 65 years who self-reported dentine hypersensitivity. Each participant with at least one tooth with hypersensitivity in two different quadrants and showing a response of ≥ 3 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) to an evaporative stimulus was included in the study. The teeth were evaluated immediately after treatment, and after 24 hrs, one week, one month and 3 months from the baseline after application of BisBlock™, an oxalate-containing desensitizer, and Gluma©, a glutaraldehyde-containing desensitizer.
Fifty participants were enrolled in the study. Means and standard deviations of VAS scores were calculated. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05. Statistically significant reduction in mean scores was found after application of Gluma© and BisBlock™ desensitizer (p < 0.001) at all time intervals. BisBlock™ yielded a statistically significant greater reduction in dentine hypersensitivity at 1 week (p < 0.05) and 1 month (p < 0.01) with evaporative stimulus.
Compared with Gluma©, BisBlock™ gave statistically significantly greater reduction in hypersensitivity.
评估并比较含草酸盐脱敏剂BisBlock™和含戊二醛脱敏剂Gluma©的疗效。
对50名年龄在18至65岁之间、自我报告有牙本质过敏的成年患者进行了一项受试者盲法随机对照试验。纳入研究的每位参与者在两个不同象限中至少有一颗牙齿过敏,并且对蒸发刺激的视觉模拟量表(VAS)反应≥3。在应用含草酸盐脱敏剂BisBlock™和含戊二醛脱敏剂Gluma©后,于治疗后即刻、24小时、1周、1个月和3个月对牙齿进行评估。
50名参与者纳入研究。计算了VAS评分的均值和标准差。显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。在所有时间间隔应用Gluma©和BisBlock™脱敏剂后,均发现平均评分有统计学显著降低(p < 0.001)。在1周(p < 0.05)和1个月(p < 0.01)时,BisBlock™对蒸发刺激引起的牙本质过敏有统计学显著更大程度的降低。
与Gluma©相比,BisBlock™在降低过敏方面有统计学显著更大的效果。