Riesenberg Lee Ann, Leitzsch Jessica, Little Brian W
1 Dr Riesenberg is with Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, and the Jefferson School of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2 Ms Leitzsch is with Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Sep/Oct;34(5):446-454. doi: 10.1177/1062860619873200.
A systematic review of published English-language articles on handoffs is conducted (1987 to June 4, 2008). Forty-six articles describing 24 handoff mnemonics are identified by trained reviewers. The majority (82.6%) have been published in the last 3 years (2006-2008), and SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) is the most frequently cited mnemonic (69.6%). Of 7 handoff research articles, only 4 study mnemonics. All 4 of these studies have relatively small sample sizes (10-100) and lack validated instruments. Only 1 study has obtained IRB approval. Scientifically rigorous research studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of handoff mnemonics. These should be published in the peer-reviewed literature using the Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines.
我们对已发表的关于交接班的英文文章进行了系统回顾（时间跨度为1987年至2008年6月4日）。经过培训的评审人员识别出了46篇描述24种交接班记忆法的文章。其中大部分（82.6%）是在过去3年（2006 - 2008年）发表的，而SBAR（情况、背景、评估、建议）是被引用最频繁的记忆法（69.6%）。在7篇交接班研究文章中，只有4篇研究记忆法。这4项研究的样本量都相对较小（10 - 100），并且缺乏经过验证的工具。只有1项研究获得了机构审查委员会（IRB）的批准。需要进行科学严谨的研究来评估交接班记忆法的有效性。这些研究应按照卓越质量改进报告标准（SQUIRE）指南发表在同行评审的文献中。
