Department of Neurology/Neuro-medical Scientific Center, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1442-z.
Amongst the most challenging diagnostic dilemmas managing patients with vestibular symptoms (i.e. vertigo, nausea, imbalance) is differentiating dangerous central vestibular disorders from benign causes. Migraine has long been recognized as one of the most common causes of vestibular symptoms, but the clinical hallmarks of vestibular migraine are notoriously inconsistent and thus the diagnosis is difficult to confirm. Here we conducted a prospective study investigating the sensitivity and specificity of combining standard vestibular and neurological examinations to determine how well central vestibular disorders (CVD) were distinguishable from vestibular migraine (VM).
Twenty-seven symptomatic patients diagnosed with CVD and 36 symptomatic patients with VM underwent brain imaging and clinical assessments including; 1) SVV bucket test, 2) ABCD, 3) headache/vertigo history, 4) presence of focal neurological signs, 5) nystagmus, and 6) clinical head impulse testing.
Mean absolute SVV deviations measured by bucket testing in CVD and VM were 4.8 ± 4.1° and 0.7 ± 1.0°, respectively. The abnormal rate of SVV deviations (> 2.3°) in CVD was significantly higher than VM (p < 0.001). Using the bucket test alone to differentiate CVD from VM, sensitivity was 74.1%, specificity 91.7%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 8.9, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.3. However, when we combined the SVV results with the clinical exam assessing gaze stability (nystagmus) with an abnormal focal neurological exam, the sensitivity (92.6%) and specificity (88.9%) were optimized (LR+ (8.3), LR- (0.08)).
The SVV bucket test is a useful clinical test to distinguish CVD from VM, particularly when interpreted along with the results of a focal neurological exam and clinical exam for nystagmus.
在管理有前庭症状(即眩晕、恶心、失衡)的患者的最具挑战性的诊断难题中,区分危险的中枢性前庭障碍与良性病因是最具挑战性的。偏头痛长期以来一直被认为是前庭症状的最常见原因之一,但前庭偏头痛的临床特征众所周知不一致,因此难以确认诊断。在这里,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,调查了结合标准前庭和神经检查来确定中枢性前庭障碍(CVD)与前庭性偏头痛(VM)之间的区分程度的敏感性和特异性。
27 例有症状的被诊断为 CVD 的患者和 36 例有症状的被诊断为 VM 的患者接受了脑部成像和临床评估,包括:1)SVV 桶测试,2)ABCD 测试,3)头痛/眩晕病史,4)是否存在局灶性神经体征,5)眼震,和 6)临床头脉冲测试。
通过桶测试测量的 CVD 和 VM 中的平均绝对 SVV 偏差分别为 4.8±4.1°和 0.7±1.0°。CVD 中的 SVV 偏差异常率(>2.3°)明显高于 VM(p<0.001)。单独使用桶测试来区分 CVD 与 VM,其敏感性为 74.1%,特异性为 91.7%,阳性似然比(LR+)为 8.9,阴性似然比(LR-)为 0.3。然而,当我们将 SVV 结果与评估凝视稳定性(眼震)的临床检查与异常局灶性神经检查相结合时,敏感性(92.6%)和特异性(88.9%)得到了优化(LR+(8.3),LR-(0.08))。
SVV 桶测试是一种有用的临床测试,可以区分 CVD 与 VM,尤其是当与局灶性神经检查和评估眼震的临床检查结果一起解释时。