Suppr超能文献

评估性别、恋爱关系状况和项目措辞如何影响大学生拒绝不同性行为时使用的线索。

Assessing How Gender, Relationship Status, and Item Wording Influence Cues Used by College Students to Decline Different Sexual Behaviors.

机构信息

Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, University of Arkansas.

Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2020 Feb;57(2):260-272. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1659218. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

Researchers rarely examine college students' event-level refusals and how refusals may change based on sexual behavior, gender, or relationship status. As such, we assessed how sexual behavior and demographic characteristics influence cues students use to decline sexual activity. As an exploratory aim, we examined the influence of item wording (such as reading the words, not willing/non-consent vs. refusal) on how students reported declining sexual activity. A sample of 615 college students from Canada and the U.S. completed a survey; students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions that manipulated item wording (not willing/non-consent vs. refusal). Students were then prompted with four open-ended questions that asked how they refused/communicated non-consent for four sexual behaviors. An inductive coding procedure was used and five overarching themes emerged. Three themes included explicit and implicit verbal cues and two themes included explicit and implicit non-verbal cues. Wording condition (i.e., not willing/non-consent v. refusal) did not influence the types of cues reported by students. Refusal communication varied by sexual behavior and relationship status but not gender. Sexual assault prevention initiatives should include more information about the variety of refusal cues used by college students in their programming, as many of these cues are currently absent.

摘要

研究人员很少研究大学生的具体情境下的拒绝行为,以及这些拒绝行为可能如何因性行为、性别或关系状况而发生变化。因此,我们评估了性行为和人口统计学特征如何影响学生用来拒绝性行为的线索。作为一个探索性的目标,我们研究了项目措辞(例如,阅读单词、不愿意/不同意与拒绝)对学生报告拒绝性行为的方式的影响。我们从加拿大和美国的 615 名大学生中随机抽取了一个样本,完成了一项调查;学生被随机分配到两种条件之一,这两种条件操纵了项目措辞(不愿意/不同意与拒绝)。然后,学生被提示回答四个开放式问题,询问他们如何拒绝/不同意四种性行为。采用了归纳式编码程序,出现了五个总体主题。三个主题包括明确和隐含的口头线索,两个主题包括明确和隐含的非言语线索。措辞条件(即不愿意/不同意与拒绝)并没有影响学生报告的线索类型。拒绝沟通因性行为和关系状况而异,但与性别无关。性侵犯预防计划应该在其项目中纳入更多关于大学生使用的各种拒绝线索的信息,因为目前许多这些线索都不存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验