Suppr超能文献

社区医药分销商之间的分工影响大规模药物给药的覆盖范围:乌干达农村的一项横断面研究。

The division of labour between community medicine distributors influences the reach of mass drug administration: A cross-sectional study in rural Uganda.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Big Data Institute, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Sep 4;13(9):e0007685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007685. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite decades of community-based mass drug administration (MDA) for neglected tropical diseases, it remains an open question as to what constitutes the best combination of community medicine distributors (CMDs) for achieving high (>65%/75%) treatment rates within a village.

METHODS

Routine community-based MDA was evaluated in Mayuge District, Uganda. For one month, we tracked 6,148 individuals aged 1+ years in 1,118 households from 28 villages. Praziquantel, albendazole, and ivermectin were distributed to treat Schistosoma mansoni, lymphatic filariasis, and soil-transmitted helminths. The similarity/diversity between CMDs was observed and used to predict the division of labour and overall village treatment rates. The division of labour was calculated by dividing the lowest treatment rate by the highest treatment rate achieved by two CMDs within a village. CMD similarity was measured for 16 characteristics including friendship network overlap, demographic and socioeconomic factors, methods of CMD selection, and years as CMD. Relevant variables for MDA outcomes were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operators with leave-one-out cross validation. Final models were run with ordinary least squares regression and robust standard errors.

RESULTS

The percentage of individuals treated with at least one drug varied across villages from 2.79-89.74%. The only significant predictor (p-value<0.05) of village treatment rates was the division of labour. The estimated difference between a perfectly equal (a 50-50 split of individuals treated) and unequal (one CMD treating no one) division of labour was 39.69%. A direct tie (close friendship) between CMDs was associated with a nearly twofold more equitable distribution of labour when compared to CMDs without a direct tie.

CONCLUSIONS

An equitable distribution of labour between CMDs may be essential for achieving treatment targets of 65%/75% within community-based MDA. To improve the effectiveness of CMDs, national programmes should explore interventions that seek to facilitate communication, friendship, and equal partnership between CMDs.

摘要

背景

尽管几十年来一直在社区开展大规模药物治疗(MDA)来治疗被忽视的热带病,但在一个村庄内实现高(>65%/75%)治疗率的最佳社区药物分发员(CMD)组合仍存在争议。

方法

在乌干达马尤盖区评估了常规的社区 MDA。在一个月内,我们跟踪了 28 个村庄的 1118 户家庭中 6148 名年龄在 1 岁以上的个体。使用吡喹酮、阿苯达唑和伊维菌素治疗曼氏血吸虫病、淋巴丝虫病和土源性蠕虫病。观察了 CMD 之间的相似性/差异性,并用其来预测分工和整个村庄的治疗率。分工是通过村庄内两个 CMD 中最低的治疗率除以最高的治疗率来计算的。对 16 个特征(包括友谊网络重叠、人口统计学和社会经济因素、CMD 选择方法和担任 CMD 的年限)进行了 CMD 相似性的测量。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)与留一交叉验证选择与 MDA 结果相关的变量。最终模型使用普通最小二乘回归和稳健标准误差进行运行。

结果

个体接受至少一种药物治疗的比例在村庄之间差异很大,从 2.79%到 89.74%。村庄治疗率的唯一显著预测因素(p 值<0.05)是分工。完全均等(治疗个体比例为 50-50)和不均等(一个 CMD 不治疗任何人)分工之间的估计差异为 39.69%。CMD 之间存在直接联系(亲密友谊)时,与没有直接联系的 CMD 相比,分工的分配更加公平。

结论

CMD 之间公平的分工对于实现社区 MDA 中 65%/75%的治疗目标可能至关重要。为了提高 CMD 的效果,国家规划应探索旨在促进 CMD 之间沟通、友谊和平等伙伴关系的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4e/6726135/2bea8ea2dd26/pntd.0007685.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验