Nutritional Biomarker Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 3;11(9):2081. doi: 10.3390/nu11092081.
Total plasma fatty acids or those in cholesteryl ester and phospholipids are often used to reflect fatty acid intake in epidemiological studies, but their relative performance as biomarkers of intake has not been clearly evaluated within a single population. The assessment of fatty acids in plasma fractions is more labor intensive. Thus, their use as biomarkers of dietary intake needs to be justified. Dietary intake was assessed in 200 population-based controls from a case-control study of diet and heart disease in Costa Rica by a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Fatty acids in fasting whole plasma and plasma fractions (cholesteryl ester, phospholipid, and triglyceride + free fatty acid) were measured in the 200 controls by the same laboratory using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). We compared the plasma and plasma fractions data with the FFQ and adipose fatty acid profile using partial Spearman correlations to assess utility as biomarkers of intake and exposure. We found that whole plasma was equally or more strongly correlated with the FFQ and adipose fatty acid profile than either cholesteryl ester or phospholipid in most of the established markers of dietary intake, including dairy (15:0 and 17:0) and seafood (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid). Of the three plasma fractions, only fatty acids in the plasma triglyceride + free fatty acid fraction had stronger correlations with dietary intake than whole plasma. In our study population, fatty acids measured in fasting whole plasma perform as good as or better than those measured in plasma fractions as biomarkers for dietary fatty acid intake. Thus, the fractionation of plasma to evaluate long-term fatty acid intake may not be warranted.
总血浆脂肪酸或胆固醇酯和磷脂中的脂肪酸通常用于反映流行病学研究中的脂肪酸摄入量,但在单一人群中,它们作为摄入量生物标志物的相对性能尚未得到明确评估。血浆各部分脂肪酸的评估更为繁琐。因此,需要证明其作为膳食摄入量生物标志物的合理性。通过验证过的食物频率问卷(FFQ),对哥斯达黎加饮食与心脏病的病例对照研究中的 200 名基于人群的对照者进行了膳食评估。同一家实验室使用气相色谱-火焰离子化检测(GC-FID),在这 200 名对照者中测量了空腹全血浆和血浆各部分(胆固醇酯、磷脂和甘油三酯+游离脂肪酸)中的脂肪酸。我们使用偏 Spearman 相关分析将血浆和血浆各部分数据与 FFQ 和脂肪脂肪酸图谱进行了比较,以评估其作为摄入量和暴露生物标志物的实用性。我们发现,在大多数既定的膳食摄入量标志物中,全血浆与 FFQ 和脂肪脂肪酸图谱的相关性与胆固醇酯或磷脂相当,或更强烈,包括乳制品(15:0 和 17:0)和海鲜(二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸)。在这三种血浆各部分中,只有血浆甘油三酯+游离脂肪酸部分中的脂肪酸与膳食摄入量的相关性强于全血浆。在我们的研究人群中,与测量血浆各部分中的脂肪酸相比,空腹全血浆中测量的脂肪酸作为膳食脂肪酸摄入量的生物标志物表现同样或更好。因此,可能不需要将血浆进行分离以评估长期脂肪酸摄入量。