Streicher Justin, Meyerson Brian Lee, Karivedu Vidhya, Sidana Abhinav
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Aug 28;11:1756287219870074. doi: 10.1177/1756287219870074. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic technique for the detection of prostate cancer. Patient selection for prostate biopsy is complex and is influenced by emerging use of prebiopsy imaging. The introduction of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy has clear advantages over the historical standard of care. There are several biopsy techniques currently utilized with unique advantages and disadvantages. We review and summarize the current body of literature pertaining to when and how a prostate biopsy should be performed. We discuss current recommendations regarding patient selection for biopsy and discuss future directions regarding prebiopsy imaging. We offer a description of the MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy technique and a comparison of many of the currently available fusion software platforms. Articles pertaining to the title were obtained via PubMed index search with relevant keywords supplemented with personal collection of related publications. Prostate biopsy should be considered for patients with gross digital rectal exam (DRE) abnormality, patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 4 ng/ml, and concomitant risk factors for prostate cancer or patients with lesions identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 2 (PI-RADS2) score of 4 or 5. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy has demonstrated advantages in cancer detection when compared with TRUS-guided biopsy. There are currently several fusion software platforms available with a variety of biopsy approaches. Future efforts should detail the role of prebiopsy imaging as a triage tool for prostate biopsy. Consensus should be sought regarding the preferred modality of fusion biopsy. Additional data describing each fusion software platform would enable a more rigorous comparison of platform sensitivities.
前列腺活检是检测前列腺癌的金标准诊断技术。前列腺活检的患者选择较为复杂,且受到活检前成像技术日益广泛应用的影响。磁共振成像(MRI)-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合前列腺活检的引入相对于传统的标准治疗方法具有明显优势。目前有几种活检技术,各有其独特的优缺点。我们回顾并总结了当前关于何时以及如何进行前列腺活检的文献。我们讨论了当前关于活检患者选择的建议,并探讨了活检前成像的未来发展方向。我们介绍了MRI-TRUS融合活检技术,并对目前许多可用的融合软件平台进行了比较。通过PubMed索引搜索,并补充相关关键词以及个人收集的相关出版物,获取了与本文标题相关的文章。对于直肠指检(DRE)有明显异常的患者、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)大于4 ng/ml的患者、伴有前列腺癌风险因素的患者或在多参数MRI(mpMRI)上发现病变且前列腺影像报告和数据系统2(PI-RADS2)评分为4或5的患者,应考虑进行前列腺活检。与TRUS引导的活检相比,MRI-TRUS融合活检在癌症检测方面已显示出优势。目前有几种融合软件平台,活检方法多种多样。未来的研究应详细阐述活检前成像作为前列腺活检分诊工具的作用。应就融合活检的首选方式达成共识。更多描述每个融合软件平台的数据将有助于更严格地比较平台的敏感性。