理解循证心理健康护理以及美国成年人样本中对科学信息的感知重要性。
Understanding of evidence-based mental health care and the perceived importance of scientific information in a sample of U.S. adults.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
出版信息
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;76(1):161-175. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22856. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
OBJECTIVES
This online survey sought to qualitatively ascertain the extent to which a sample of U.S. adults understood the concept of evidence-based mental health care (EBMHC). Additional goals included assessing the perceived importance of scientific information in EBMHC, and examining whether understanding EBMHC and science values varied as a function of participant factors.
METHOD
Participants (N = 221) defined EBMHC and rated the importance of scientific information. Open-ended EBMHC definitions were content-coded, and binomial logistic and linear regressions examined predictors of accurately defining EBMHC and of the perceived importance of scientific information.
RESULTS
Participants endorsed seven definitions of EBMHC, and only 20% defined it accurately. Having greater knowledge about mental health conditions was associated with understanding EBMHC and with the higher perceived importance of scientific information. Greater help-seeking efficacy also predicted higher perceived importance of scientific information.
CONCLUSIONS
Results support customized strategies to promote basic EBMHC education among U.S. adults.
目的
本在线调查旨在定性评估美国成年人对循证心理健康护理（EBMHC）概念的理解程度。其他目标包括评估科学信息在 EBMHC 中的感知重要性，以及检验理解 EBMHC 和科学价值观是否因参与者因素而异。
方法
参与者（N=221）定义 EBMHC 并对科学信息的重要性进行评分。EBMHC 的开放式定义进行内容编码，二项逻辑回归和线性回归检验了准确定义 EBMHC 和感知科学信息重要性的预测因素。
结果
参与者认可了七种 EBMHC 的定义，只有 20%的人能准确定义。对心理健康状况有更多的了解与理解 EBMHC 和感知科学信息的重要性更高相关。更大的寻求帮助效能也预示着感知科学信息的重要性更高。
结论
结果支持针对美国成年人制定基本 EBMHC 教育的定制策略。
Zotero 插件