Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e031070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031070.
Patients with liver disease frequently require hospitalisation with infection often the trigger. Influenza vaccination is an effective infection prevention strategy in healthy and elderly but is often perceived less beneficial in patients with liver disease. We investigated whether influenza vaccination triggered serological response and prevented hospitalisation and death in liver disease.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL up to January 2019.
Randomised or observational studies of the effects of influenza vaccine in adults with liver disease.
Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence. Primary outcomes were all-cause hospitalisation and mortality. Secondary outcomes were cause-specific hospitalisation and mortality, and serological vaccine response. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled effects of vaccination.
We found 10 041 unique records, 286 were eligible for full-text review and 12 were included. Most patients had viral liver disease. All studies were of very low quality. Liver patients both with and without cirrhosis mounted an antibody response to influenza vaccination, and vaccination was associated with a reduction in risk of hospital admission from 205/1000 to 149/1000 (risk difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.04) in patients with viral liver disease. Vaccinated patients were 27% less likely to be admitted to hospital compared with unvaccinated patients (risk ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). No effect against all-cause or cause-specific mortality or cause-specific hospitalisation was found.
The low quantity and quality of the evidence means that the protective vaccine effect may be uncertain. Considering the high risk of serious health outcomes from influenza infection in patients with liver disease and the safety and low cost of vaccination, overall, the potential benefits of seasonal vaccination both to patients and the healthcare systems are likely to outweigh the costs and risks associated with vaccination.
CRD42017067277.
患有肝病的患者经常需要住院治疗,感染通常是触发因素。流感疫苗接种是一种在健康人群和老年人中预防感染的有效策略,但在肝病患者中,人们通常认为其益处较小。我们研究了流感疫苗接种是否能引发血清学反应,并预防肝病患者的住院和死亡。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed 和 CENTRAL 数据库,检索时间截至 2019 年 1 月。
评估流感疫苗对成人肝病影响的随机或观察性研究。
两名评审员筛选研究,提取数据,并评估偏倚风险和证据质量。主要结局为全因住院和死亡率。次要结局为病因特异性住院和死亡率以及血清学疫苗反应。使用随机效应荟萃分析来估计疫苗接种的 pooled 效果。
我们发现了 10041 条独特的记录,其中 286 条记录符合全文审查标准,最终纳入 12 项研究。大多数患者患有病毒性肝病。所有研究的质量均为极低。患有病毒性和非病毒性肝病的患者均对流感疫苗产生了抗体反应,与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗可降低病毒性肝病患者的住院风险,从每 1000 人 205 例降至每 1000 人 149 例(风险差异-0.06,95%CI-0.07 至 0.04)。与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗的患者住院的可能性降低了 27%(风险比 0.73,95%CI 0.66 至 0.80)。未发现对全因或病因特异性死亡率或病因特异性住院的影响。
证据的数量和质量都很低,这意味着保护性疫苗的效果可能并不确定。考虑到流感感染对肝病患者造成严重健康后果的高风险,以及疫苗接种的安全性和低成本,季节性接种对患者和医疗保健系统的潜在益处可能超过与接种相关的成本和风险。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017067277。