• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“更大”或“更好”:大小和效价在“情感偏差”中的作用。

"Bigger" or "better": the roles of magnitude and valence in "affective bias".

机构信息

Neuroscience and Mental Health group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):633-642. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1662373. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2019.1662373
PMID:31496360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7446041/
Abstract

Negative affective biases are thought to be a key symptom driving and upholding many psychiatric disorders. When presented with ambiguous information, anxious individuals, for example, tend to anticipate lower rewards than asymptomatic individuals (Aylward et al., 2019. Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders. ). The assumption is that this is because anxious individuals assume "worse" outcomes. However, predictions are often made about high and low rewards, so it is not clear whether the bias is due to the valence (the "worse" option) or just magnitude (the lower number). We therefore explored the roles of valence and magnitude in a translational measure of negative affective bias. We adapted a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) "reward-reward" task into a "punishment-punishment" paradigm, and followed up with "high reward-high punishment" and "low reward-high punishment" variants. The results from the "punishment-punishment" paradigm - a bias in healthy controls - suggest that it is outcome that is important. However, this is qualified by the other variants which indicate that both valence and magnitude are important. Overall, our results temper the assumption that negative affective biases observed in tasks using numeric outcomes are solely as a result of subjective outcome valence.

摘要

消极情感偏差被认为是驱动和维持许多精神障碍的关键症状。例如,当面临模棱两可的信息时,焦虑个体往往比无症状个体预期更低的奖励(Aylward 等人,2019 年。将啮齿动物的负性偏差测量转化为人类:诱导焦虑和未经治疗的情绪和焦虑障碍的影响)。假设是因为焦虑个体假设“更糟”的结果。然而,通常会对高奖励和低奖励进行预测,因此尚不清楚偏差是由于效价(“更糟”的选项)还是仅仅是幅度(较低的数字)造成的。因此,我们探讨了在消极情感偏差的转化测量中效价和幅度的作用。我们将 2AFC“奖励-奖励”任务改编为“惩罚-惩罚”范式,并进行了“高奖励-高惩罚”和“低奖励-高惩罚”变体的后续研究。“惩罚-惩罚”范式的结果——健康对照组的偏差——表明结果很重要。然而,其他变体的结果表明,效价和幅度都很重要。总体而言,我们的结果缓和了这样一种假设,即在使用数字结果的任务中观察到的消极情感偏差仅仅是由于主观结果效价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/a15fa22942ed/PCEM_A_1662373_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/575db83b9815/PCEM_A_1662373_F0001_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/25a0dbd54d8b/PCEM_A_1662373_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/03960d41ee05/PCEM_A_1662373_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/a15fa22942ed/PCEM_A_1662373_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/575db83b9815/PCEM_A_1662373_F0001_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/25a0dbd54d8b/PCEM_A_1662373_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/03960d41ee05/PCEM_A_1662373_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f9/7446041/a15fa22942ed/PCEM_A_1662373_F0004_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
"Bigger" or "better": the roles of magnitude and valence in "affective bias".“更大”或“更好”:大小和效价在“情感偏差”中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):633-642. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1662373. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders.将啮齿动物的负性偏向测量转化为人类:诱导性焦虑以及未经药物治疗的心境和焦虑障碍的影响。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jan;50(2):237-246. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718004117. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
3
Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations.背侧纹状体对奖励和惩罚的反应:效价和强度操纵的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):27-38. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.27.
4
Tryptophan depletion disinhibits punishment but not reward prediction: implications for resilience.色氨酸耗竭抑制惩罚但不抑制奖励预测:对韧性的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2410-5. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
5
Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.在奖励-奖励辨别认知偏差任务中,居住条件会影响大鼠对两种模糊性的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
6
Interactions between incentive valence and action information in a cued approach-avoidance task.线索化趋避任务中动机效价与动作信息之间的相互作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0975-x. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Depression is associated with reduced outcome sensitivity in a dual valence, magnitude learning task.抑郁与双价、幅度学习任务中的结果敏感性降低有关。
Psychol Med. 2024 Feb;54(3):631-636. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002520. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
8
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences.激励价值和效价对离散动作序列表现的交互作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 29;11(1):9327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88286-5.
9
Outcome valence and stimulus frequency affect neural responses to rewards and punishments.结果效价和刺激频率影响对奖励和惩罚的神经反应。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Mar;59(3):e13981. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13981. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species.评估一种新的转化任务,以评估不同物种的情绪偏见。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;12(2):373-81. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0076-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling.使用计算因子建模识别心理健康中的跨诊断机制。
Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 15;93(8):690-703. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.09.034. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Does social distancing affect the processing of brand logos?社交距离会影响品牌标识的处理吗?
Brain Behav. 2022 Mar;12(3):e2501. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2501. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
3
Association Between a Directly Translated Cognitive Measure of Negative Bias and Self-reported Psychiatric Symptoms.

本文引用的文献

1
Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders.将啮齿动物的负性偏向测量转化为人类:诱导性焦虑以及未经药物治疗的心境和焦虑障碍的影响。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jan;50(2):237-246. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718004117. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
2
Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.扩散模型揭示了大鼠负性判断偏差背后的决策过程。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152592. eCollection 2016.
3
Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species.
直接翻译的负性偏向认知测量与自我报告的精神症状之间的关联。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Feb;7(2):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
评估一种新的转化任务,以评估不同物种的情绪偏见。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;12(2):373-81. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0076-4.
4
Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.刻板印象认为椋鸟更“悲观”。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):721-31. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0323-z. Epub 2010 May 13.
5
Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task.重度抑郁症中享乐能力降低:来自概率性奖励任务的证据。
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Nov;43(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
6
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
7
Mood-congruent bias in affective go/no-go performance of unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder.未接受药物治疗的重度抑郁症患者在情感性“是/否”任务表现中的心境一致性偏差。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;162(11):2171-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2171.
8
Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders.关于情绪及情绪障碍的认知方法。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45:25-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325.
9
Depression: a breakdown of perceptual defence?
Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;145:358-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.145.4.358.
10
Construct accessibility and depression: an examination of cognitive and affective factors.建构易接近性与抑郁:认知和情感因素的考察
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Aug;47(2):427-39. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.47.2.427.