Clarkson Matthew J, May Anthony K, Warmington Stuart A
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1058. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01058. eCollection 2019.
Blood flow restriction or KAATSU exercise training is associated with greater muscle mass and strength increases than non-blood flow restriction equivalent exercise. Blood flow restriction exercise has been proposed as a possible alternative to more physically demanding exercise prescriptions (such as high-load/high-intensity resistance training) in a range of clinical and chronic disease populations. While the maintenance of muscle mass and size with reduced musculoskeletal tissue loading appeals in many of these physically impaired populations, there remains a disconnect between some of the desired clinical measures for chronic disease populations and those commonly measured in the literature examining blood flow restriction exercise. While strength does play a vital role in physical function, task-specific objective measures of physical function indicative of activities of daily living are often more clinically relevant and applicable for evaluating the success of medical and surgical interventions or monitoring age- and disease-related physical decline. To determine whether exercise interventions utilizing blood flow restriction are able to improve objective measures of physical function indicative of activities of daily living. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Springer identified 13 randomized control trials utilizing an exercise intervention combined with blood flow restriction, while measuring at least one objective measure of physical function. Participants were ≥18 years of age. Systematic review of the literature and quality assessment of the included studies used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk bias. Data from 13 studies with a total of 332 participants showed blood flow restriction exercise, regardless of modality, most notably increased performance on the 30 s sit-to-stand and timed up and go tests, and generally improved physical function on other tests including walking tests, variations of sit-to-stand tests, and balance, jumping, and stepping tests. From the evidence available, blood flow restriction exercise of multiple modalities improved objective measures of physical function indicative of activities of daily living.
与非血流限制等效运动相比,血流限制或KAATSU运动训练与更大的肌肉量增加和力量增长相关。在一系列临床和慢性疾病人群中,血流限制运动已被提议作为对身体要求更高的运动处方(如高负荷/高强度抗阻训练)的一种可能替代方案。虽然在许多这些身体受损人群中,通过减少肌肉骨骼组织负荷来维持肌肉量和尺寸很有吸引力,但在慢性病患者群体的一些期望的临床指标与文献中通常测量的血流限制运动指标之间仍存在脱节。虽然力量在身体功能中确实起着至关重要的作用,但指示日常生活活动的特定任务的身体功能客观指标通常在临床上更具相关性,并且更适用于评估医疗和手术干预的成功与否或监测与年龄和疾病相关的身体衰退。为了确定利用血流限制的运动干预是否能够改善指示日常生活活动的身体功能客观指标。对Medline、Embase、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus和Springer进行系统检索,确定了13项随机对照试验,这些试验采用了结合血流限制的运动干预,同时测量了至少一项身体功能客观指标。参与者年龄≥18岁。对文献的系统综述和纳入研究的质量评估使用了Cochrane协作网评估偏倚风险的工具。来自13项研究的共332名参与者的数据显示,无论采用何种方式,血流限制运动最显著地提高了30秒坐立试验和计时起立行走试验的表现,并且在包括步行试验、坐立试验变体以及平衡、跳跃和踏步试验等其他试验中总体上改善了身体功能。根据现有证据,多种方式的血流限制运动改善了指示日常生活活动的身体功能客观指标。