Clarkson Matthew J, Fraser Steve F, Bennett Paul N, McMahon Lawrence P, Brumby Catherine, Warmington Stuart A
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, 3125, Australia.
Medical and Clinical Affairs, Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, CA, USA.
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Sep 11;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0713-4.
Exercise during haemodialysis improves strength and physical function. However, both patients and clinicians are time poor, and current exercise recommendations add an excessive time burden making exercise a rare addition to standard care. Hypothetically, blood flow restriction exercise performed during haemodialysis can provide greater value for time spent exercising, reducing this time burden while producing similar or greater outcomes. This study will explore the efficacy of blood flow restriction exercise for enhancing strength and physical function among haemodialysis patients.
This is a randomised controlled trial design. A total of 75 participants will be recruited from haemodialysis clinics. Participants will be allocated to a blood flow restriction cycling group, traditional cycling group or usual care control group. Both exercising groups will complete 3 months of cycling exercise, performed intradialytically, three times per week. The blood flow restriction cycling group will complete two 10-min cycling bouts separated by a 20-min rest at a subjective effort of 15 on a 6 to 20 rating scale. This will be done with pressurised cuffs fitted proximally on the active limbs during exercise at 50% of a pre-determined limb occlusion pressure. The traditional cycling group will perform a continuous 20-min bout of exercise at a subjective effort of 12 on the same subjective effort scale. These workloads and volumes are equivalent and allow for comparison of a common blood flow restriction aerobic exercise prescription and a traditional aerobic exercise prescription. The primary outcome measures are lower limb strength, assessed by a three repetition maximum leg extension test, as well as objective measures of physical function: six-minute walk test, 30-s sit to stand, and timed up and go. Secondary outcome measures include thigh muscle cross sectional area, body composition, routine pathology, quality of life, and physical activity engagement.
This study will determine the efficacy of blood flow restriction exercise among dialysis patients for improving key physiological outcomes that impact independence and quality of life, with reduced burden on patients. This may have broader implications for other clinical populations with similarly declining muscle health and physical function, and those contraindicated to higher intensities of exercise.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register: ACTRN12616000121460.
血液透析期间进行锻炼可增强力量和身体机能。然而,患者和临床医生的时间都很紧张,当前的锻炼建议会增加过多的时间负担,导致锻炼很少被纳入标准护理。从理论上讲,在血液透析期间进行血流限制训练可为锻炼时间带来更大价值,减少这种时间负担,同时产生相似或更好的效果。本研究将探讨血流限制训练对增强血液透析患者力量和身体机能的疗效。
这是一项随机对照试验设计。将从血液透析诊所招募75名参与者。参与者将被分配到血流限制骑行组、传统骑行组或常规护理对照组。两个锻炼组都将进行为期3个月的骑行锻炼,在透析期间进行,每周三次。血流限制骑行组将完成两次10分钟的骑行,中间休息20分钟,主观用力程度为6至20分制中的15分。在锻炼期间,将在活动肢体近端佩戴加压袖带,压力为预先确定的肢体闭塞压力的50%。传统骑行组将在相同的主观用力程度量表上以主观用力程度12进行连续20分钟的锻炼。这些工作量和运动量是等效的,便于比较常见的血流限制有氧运动处方和传统有氧运动处方。主要结局指标是下肢力量,通过三次重复最大腿部伸展测试进行评估,以及身体机能的客观指标:6分钟步行测试、30秒坐立测试和计时起立行走测试。次要结局指标包括大腿肌肉横截面积、身体成分、常规病理学、生活质量和身体活动参与度。
本研究将确定血流限制训练对透析患者改善影响独立性和生活质量的关键生理结局的疗效,同时减轻患者负担。这可能对其他肌肉健康和身体机能同样下降且有高强度运动禁忌的临床人群具有更广泛的意义。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12616000121460。