Suppr超能文献

2升聚乙二醇单独使用或与抗坏血酸联用对比4升聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查的疗效比较:一项对12项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative Efficacy of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Alone or With Ascorbic Acid vs. 4 L Polyethylene Glycol for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Tian Xu, Shi Bing, Chen Hui, Liu Xiao-Ling, Tang Rong-Ying, Pi Yuan-Ping, Chen Wei-Qing

机构信息

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Department of Nursing, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 21;6:182. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00182. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Colonoscopy remains an optimal approach for early detection and treatment of gastrointestinal lesions, however adequate bowel preparation is the critical contributor to effective and safe colonoscopy. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel cleansing regime has been the first recommendation before colonoscopy, however it remains unknown which regime is the optimal option. The aim of our study is to determine the comparative efficacy of 2 L PEG alone or plus ascorbic acid (Asc) vs. 4 L PEG alone for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We assigned two independent investigators to search and screen potential records, extract essential information, and appraise the risk of bias of individual study accordingly. Then, we adopted RevMan 5.3, Stata 14.0, and WinBUGS 1.4 software to perform all statistical analyses. We also calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SCURA) in order to rank all regimes. Twelve studies involving 4,106 patients were analyzed finally. Pooled results indicated an improved bowel preparation efficacy in 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid with split-dose regime rather than in 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18-0.36), 4 L PEG with split dose (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.17-4.66), and 4 L PEG (OR, 4.53; 95% CI, 3.07-6.67) regimes, which was confirmed by network meta-analyses; a better compliance in 2 L PEG plus Asc with split dose (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.51-6.30) and 4 L PEG with split dose (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82) regime rather than in 4 L PEG regime, but network meta-analyses generated inconsistency results; a higher preference in 2 L PEG plus Asc with split dose regime rather than in 4 L PEG split dose (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.02-4.90), which were not supported by network meta-analyses; no statistically significant difference when all regimes compared with each other in terms of adverse events. As for bowel preparation before colonoscopy, 2 L PEG ascorbic acid with split dose should be optimally prescribed. Further studies investigating the comparative efficacy of 2 L PEG related to 4 L PEG, 4 L PEG with split dose, and 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid with split dose, respectively are needed.

摘要

结肠镜检查仍然是早期发现和治疗胃肠道病变的最佳方法,然而充分的肠道准备是有效且安全的结肠镜检查的关键因素。基于聚乙二醇(PEG)的肠道清洁方案一直是结肠镜检查前的首选建议,然而哪种方案是最佳选择仍不清楚。我们研究的目的是确定单独使用2L PEG或加用抗坏血酸(Asc)与单独使用4L PEG进行结肠镜检查前肠道清洁的比较疗效。我们指定两名独立研究人员搜索和筛选潜在记录,提取基本信息,并相应评估个体研究的偏倚风险。然后,我们采用RevMan 5.3、Stata 14.0和WinBUGS 1.4软件进行所有统计分析。我们还计算了累积排序曲线下面积(SCURA)以对所有方案进行排序。最终分析了涉及4106例患者的12项研究。汇总结果表明,与2L PEG加抗坏血酸(OR,0.25;95%CI,0.18 - 0.36)、分剂量4L PEG(OR,3.18;95%CI,2.17 - 4.66)和4L PEG(OR,4.53;95%CI,3.07 - 6.67)方案相比,2L PEG加抗坏血酸分剂量方案的肠道准备效果更好,网络荟萃分析证实了这一点;与4L PEG方案相比,2L PEG加Asc分剂量(OR,3.08;95%CI,1.51 - 6.30)和4L PEG分剂量(OR,0.43;95%CI,0.22 - 0.82)方案的依从性更好,但网络荟萃分析产生了不一致的结果;与4L PEG分剂量方案相比,2L PEG加Asc分剂量方案的患者偏好更高(OR,2.24;95%CI,1.02 - 4.90),网络荟萃分析不支持这一点;在不良事件方面,所有方案相互比较时无统计学显著差异。对于结肠镜检查前的肠道准备,应最佳开具2L PEG抗坏血酸分剂量处方。需要进一步分别研究2L PEG与4L PEG、4L PEG分剂量以及2L PEG加抗坏血酸分剂量的比较疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验