• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从电子健康记录中的临床记录中提取以患者为中心的结果:根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的评估

Extracting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Clinical Notes in Electronic Health Records: Assessment of Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Gori Davide, Banerjee Imon, Chung Benjamin I, Ferrari Michelle, Rucci Paola, Blayney Douglas W, Brooks James D, Hernandez-Boussard Tina

机构信息

University of Bologna, IT.

Stanford University, US.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Aug 20;7(1):43. doi: 10.5334/egems.297.

DOI:10.5334/egems.297
PMID:31497615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6706996/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess documentation of urinary incontinence (UI) in prostatectomy patients using unstructured clinical notes from Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

METHODS

We developed a weakly-supervised natural language processing tool to extract assessments, as recorded in unstructured text notes, of UI before and after radical prostatectomy in a single academic practice across multiple clinicians. Validation was carried out using a subset of patients who completed EPIC-26 surveys before and after surgery. The prevalence of UI as assessed by EHR and EPIC-26 was compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. The agreement of reported UI between EHR and EPIC-26 was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 4870 patients and 716 surveys were included. Preoperative prevalence of UI was 12.7 percent. Postoperative prevalence was 71.8 percent at 3 months, 50.2 percent at 6 months and 34.4 and 41.8 at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Similar rates were recorded by physicians in the EHR, particularly for early follow-up. For all time points, the agreement between EPIC-26 and the EHR was moderate (all p < 0.001) and ranged from 86.7 percent agreement at baseline (Kappa = 0.48) to 76.4 percent agreement at 24 months postoperative (Kappa = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a tool to assess documentation of UI after prostatectomy using EHR clinical notes. Our results suggest such a tool can facilitate unbiased measurement of important PCOs using real-word data, which are routinely recorded in EHR unstructured clinician notes. Integrating PCO information into clinical decision support can help guide shared treatment decisions and promote patient-valued care.

摘要

目的

利用电子健康记录(EHR)中的非结构化临床记录,评估前列腺切除患者尿失禁(UI)的记录情况。

方法

我们开发了一种弱监督自然语言处理工具,以提取在多个临床医生的单一学术实践中,非结构化文本记录里根治性前列腺切除术前和术后UI的评估情况。使用一部分术前和术后完成EPIC - 26调查的患者进行验证。采用重复测量方差分析比较EHR和EPIC - 26评估的UI患病率。使用Cohen's Kappa系数评估EHR和EPIC - 26报告的UI之间的一致性。

结果

共纳入4870例患者和716份调查。术前UI患病率为12.7%。术后3个月患病率为71.8%,6个月为50.2%,12个月和24个月分别为34.4%和41.8%。EHR中的医生记录了相似的比例,尤其是在早期随访中。在所有时间点,EPIC - 26与EHR之间的一致性为中等(所有p < 0.001),范围从基线时的86.7%一致(Kappa = 0.48)到术后24个月的76.4%一致(Kappa = 0.047)。

结论

我们开发了一种工具,用于使用EHR临床记录评估前列腺切除术后UI的记录情况。我们的结果表明,这样的工具可以利用真实世界数据促进对重要患者护理结局(PCOs)的无偏测量,这些数据通常记录在EHR的非结构化临床医生记录中。将PCO信息整合到临床决策支持中有助于指导共同的治疗决策并促进以患者为导向的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/6706996/9d3fd2a74129/egems-7-1-297-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/6706996/f8c6e35d1734/egems-7-1-297-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/6706996/9d3fd2a74129/egems-7-1-297-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/6706996/f8c6e35d1734/egems-7-1-297-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/6706996/9d3fd2a74129/egems-7-1-297-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Extracting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Clinical Notes in Electronic Health Records: Assessment of Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy.从电子健康记录中的临床记录中提取以患者为中心的结果:根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的评估
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Aug 20;7(1):43. doi: 10.5334/egems.297.
2
Clinical Documentation to Predict Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.预测前列腺癌前列腺切除术后尿失禁相关因素的临床记录
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jan 23;12:7-14. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S234178. eCollection 2020.
3
Phenotyping severity of patient-centered outcomes using clinical notes: A prostate cancer use case.利用临床记录对以患者为中心的结局的严重程度进行表型分析:一个前列腺癌的应用案例。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Jul 17;4(4):e10237. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10237. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Urinary Incontinence-85: An Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite (EPIC) Score Cutoff Value for Urinary Incontinence Determined Using Long-term Functional Data by Repeated Prospective EPIC-Score Self-assessment After Radical Prostatectomy.尿失禁-85:前列腺癌扩展综合(EPIC)评分临界值的确定,该临界值通过前列腺癌根治术后重复前瞻性EPIC评分自我评估,利用长期功能数据来判定尿失禁情况。
Int Neurourol J. 2017 Dec;21(4):302-308. doi: 10.5213/inj.1735000.500. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
5
New Paradigms for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Electronic Medical Records: An Example of Detecting Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy.电子病历中以患者为中心的结局研究新范式:前列腺切除术后尿失禁检测实例
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 May 12;4(3):1231. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1231. eCollection 2016.
6
Finding Important Terms for Patients in Their Electronic Health Records: A Learning-to-Rank Approach Using Expert Annotations.在患者电子健康记录中查找重要术语:一种使用专家注释的排序学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Nov 30;4(4):e40. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6373.
7
Integrating Option Grid Patient Decision Aids in the Epic Electronic Health Record: Case Study at 5 Health Systems.在 Epic 电子健康记录中整合选项网格患者决策辅助工具:5 个卫生系统的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22766. doi: 10.2196/22766.
8
A novel tool to predict functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the value of additional surgery for incontinence.一种预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术后功能结局的新工具,以及对尿失禁进行额外手术的价值。
BJU Int. 2021 May;127(5):575-584. doi: 10.1111/bju.15242. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Weakly supervised natural language processing for assessing patient-centered outcome following prostate cancer treatment.用于评估前列腺癌治疗后以患者为中心的结果的弱监督自然语言处理
JAMIA Open. 2019 Apr;2(1):150-159. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy057. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
[Quality of life after robotic prostatectomy: Impact of BMI and age on urinary incontinence].机器人前列腺切除术后的生活质量:体重指数和年龄对尿失禁的影响
Prog Urol. 2017 Mar;27(4):244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of natural language processing for the identification of ageing syndromes including sarcopenia, frailty and falls in electronic healthcare records: a systematic review.利用自然语言处理技术在电子医疗记录中识别包括肌肉减少症、虚弱和跌倒在内的老年综合征:系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jul 2;53(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae135.
2
Natural language processing systems for extracting information from electronic health records about activities of daily living. A systematic review.用于从电子健康记录中提取日常生活活动信息的自然语言处理系统。一项系统综述。
JAMIA Open. 2024 May 24;7(2):ooae044. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae044. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in Electronic Phenotyping: From Rule-Based Definitions to Machine Learning Models.电子表型分析的进展:从基于规则的定义到机器学习模型
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018 Jul;1:53-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013315. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Architecture and Implementation of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌临床研究数据仓库的架构与实现
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jun 1;6(1):13. doi: 10.5334/egems.234.
3
Enhanced Quality Measurement Event Detection: An Application to Physician Reporting.
Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in detecting superficial surgical site infections from free text electronic health record data.
评估深度神经网络从自由文本电子健康记录数据中检测浅表手术部位感染的效用。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 8;5:1249835. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1249835. eCollection 2023.
4
Developing a Data and Analytics Platform to Enable a Breast Cancer Learning Health System at a Regional Cancer Center.开发数据和分析平台,以在区域癌症中心实现乳腺癌学习型健康系统。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Mar;7:e2200182. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00182.
5
Clinical Documentation to Predict Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.预测前列腺癌前列腺切除术后尿失禁相关因素的临床记录
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jan 23;12:7-14. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S234178. eCollection 2020.
6
Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care.利用数字数据为癌症优质护理提供信息并加以改善。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Apr;29(4):816-822. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0873. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
增强型质量测量事件检测:在医生报告中的应用
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 May 30;5(1):5. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1270.
4
Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years.局限性前列腺癌的放射治疗、手术或观察与3年后患者报告结局之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-1140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1704.
5
Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放疗或主动监测的选择与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1652.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗后的患者报告结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
New Paradigms for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Electronic Medical Records: An Example of Detecting Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy.电子病历中以患者为中心的结局研究新范式:前列腺切除术后尿失禁检测实例
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 May 12;4(3):1231. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1231. eCollection 2016.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes vs. Clinician Symptom Reporting During Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌放化疗期间患者报告的结局与临床医生症状报告的对比
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2012 Jul;5(4):119-24.
9
Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.2003 年至 2007 年微创和经耻骨后前列腺根治术的全国时间趋势:来自 100%医疗保险样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors.开发和验证扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表的简化版,用于测量前列腺癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量。
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Mar 28.