Rejuvacare PC Regenerative Medicine , Victoria, BC, Canada.
Family Physician , Victoria, BC, Canada.
Platelets. 2020 Jul 3;31(5):661-666. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2019.1663808. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Single-spin methods of preparation of platelet-rich plasma are used widely in private practice, yet they have not been extensively studied and compared. The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by the private practitioner can be facilitated by efficient and predictable PRP preparation. The primary purpose of this study was to study common methods of single-spin PRP preparation to determine their efficiency and variability. Six single-spin methods of PRP production from whole blood were analyzed. The primary measures were mean yield and standard deviation as the quotient of total platelet count in PRP produced divided by total platelet count in whole blood utilized. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and the results were averaged. Secondary measures included red blood cell count (RBC) and white blood cell count (WBC), concentration ratio, and variable cost per million platelets produced. Sixty-four volunteers provided samples from 30 June 2017 to 30 September 2018. Seventeen to twenty six samples were utilized to assess each method. Yields for the six preparation methods (PMs) varied from 53(±18)% to 72(±13)%. Differences were observed for WBC count (1.8 to 14), Hematocrit (0.8 to 32), platelet concentration (568 to 1062), and variable cost per billion platelets produced ($1.55 to $44.31). All six methods evaluated provided a platelet yield of more than 50%, although two methods were less efficient than the others. Two methods were able to produce leukocyte-poor PRP. Variability was moderate across all methods, suggesting that estimation of platelet yield should be feasible from a baseline platelet count for all methods.
单旋法制备富含血小板血浆(PRP)在私人执业中广泛应用,但尚未得到广泛研究和比较。私人执业者可以通过高效且可预测的 PRP 制备来使用 PRP。本研究的主要目的是研究常见的单旋 PRP 制备方法,以确定其效率和可变性。分析了从全血中制备 PRP 的 6 种单旋方法。主要测量值为平均产量和标准偏差,即 PRP 中血小板总数与所用全血中血小板总数的商。每个样本分析 3 次,结果取平均值。次要指标包括红细胞计数(RBC)和白细胞计数(WBC)、浓度比和每百万血小板产生的可变成本。64 名志愿者于 2017 年 6 月 30 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日提供样本。每种方法评估使用 17 至 26 个样本。6 种制备方法(PM)的产量从 53(±18)%到 72(±13)%不等。观察到 WBC 计数(1.8 至 14)、血细胞比容(0.8 至 32)、血小板浓度(568 至 1062)和每十亿血小板产生的可变成本($1.55 至 $44.31)的差异。所有 6 种方法的血小板产量均超过 50%,尽管其中两种方法的效率低于其他方法。两种方法能够产生白细胞较少的 PRP。所有方法的变异性均为中等,表明所有方法的血小板产量估计都应基于基线血小板计数来实现。