• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同训练负荷对抗阻训练男性情感反应的急性影响。

Acute Effects of Different Training Loads on Affective Responses in Resistance-trained Men.

机构信息

Center for Research in Health Sciences, University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.

Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(13):850-855. doi: 10.1055/a-0997-6680. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1055/a-0997-6680
PMID:31499564
Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute effects of different training loads on ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort and feelings of pleasure/displeasure in resistance-trained men. Twelve resistance-trained men (26.7±3.5 years, 85.1±17.5 kg, and 174. 9±9.9 cm) performed 3 sets of the bench press, squat on a hack machine, and lat pulldown, until volitional concentric failure in two separate conditions: a moderate load (MOD) consisting of a relative load of 8-12 repetitions maximum (RM), and a light load (LIT) consisting of a relative load of 25-30RM. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), session rating of perceived discomfort (sRPD), and session pleasure/displeasure feelings (sPDF) were assessed after 15 min after the ending of each session. A randomized, counterbalanced, crossover study was performed with 48 h recovery afforded between sessions. Differences between conditions were observed for sRPE and sRPD, in which scores for LIT were greater than MOD (sRPE: MOD=5.5±1.0 vs. LIT=6.4±0.7; sRPD: MOD=6.7±1.7 vs. LIT=8.7±1.0). For sPDF, MOD reported feelings of pleasure (1.2), whereas the LIT presented a feeling of displeasure (-2.3). Results suggest that resistance training performed with a light load until failure induces higher degrees of effort, discomfort and displeasure compared to a moderate load.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探究不同训练负荷对阻力训练男性的主观用力感觉和不舒适感以及快感/不快感的急性影响。12 名阻力训练男性(26.7±3.5 岁,85.1±17.5kg,174.9±9.9cm)在两种不同条件下完成 3 组卧推、哈克深蹲和下拉:中度负荷(MOD),相对负荷为 8-12 次最大重复(RM);轻负荷(LIT),相对负荷为 25-30RM。在每次训练结束后 15 分钟,评估训练后主观用力感觉(sRPE)、训练后主观不舒适感觉(sRPD)和训练后快感/不快感(sPDF)。采用随机、交叉平衡设计,两次训练之间有 48 小时的恢复时间。结果发现,sRPE 和 sRPD 存在条件差异,其中 LIT 的得分大于 MOD(sRPE:MOD=5.5±1.0 vs. LIT=6.4±0.7;sRPD:MOD=6.7±1.7 vs. LIT=8.7±1.0)。对于 sPDF,MOD 报告有快感(1.2),而 LIT 则有不快感(-2.3)。结果表明,与中度负荷相比,轻负荷直至力竭的阻力训练会引起更高的努力、不舒适和不快感。

相似文献

1
Acute Effects of Different Training Loads on Affective Responses in Resistance-trained Men.不同训练负荷对抗阻训练男性情感反应的急性影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(13):850-855. doi: 10.1055/a-0997-6680. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
Acute effect of different resistance training loads on perceived effort and affectivity in older women: a cross-over and randomized study.不同抗阻训练负荷对老年女性感知用力和情感的急性影响:交叉随机研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jun;34(6):1333-1339. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-02062-z. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
3
Work distribution influences session ratings of perceived exertion response during resistance exercise matched for total volume.在总运动量匹配的抗阻训练中,工作分配会影响感知运动强度反应的训练课评分。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jul;28(7):2042-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000342.
4
Perceived exertion responses to changing resistance training programming variables.对不断变化的阻力训练计划变量的主观用力感觉反应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jun;29(6):1564-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000775.
5
Session rating of perceived exertion following resistance exercise with blood flow restriction.血流限制阻力运动后主观用力程度的会话评分
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015 Sep;35(5):323-7. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12128. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
6
The interplay between internal and external load parameters during different strength training sessions in resistance-trained men.在抗阻训练男性不同力量训练期间,内部和外部负荷参数之间的相互作用。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jan;21(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1725646. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
Session ratings of perceived exertion responses during resistance training bouts equated for total work but differing in work rate.在总工作量相等但工作率不同的情况下,对阻力训练回合中感知用力反应的会话评分。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Feb;28(2):540-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b569c.
8
Drop-Set Resistance Training versus Pyramidal and Traditional Sets Elicits Greater Psychophysiological Responses in Men.递减组抗阻训练与金字塔组和传统组相比,引起男性更大的心理生理反应。
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Aug;130(4):1624-1643. doi: 10.1177/00315125231176729. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Acute Resistance Exercise Performed at Imposed and Self-Selected Loads in Recreationally Trained Women.在休闲训练女性中,在施加负荷和自我选择负荷下进行急性抗阻运动时的主观用力程度评级
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2313-2318. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001782.
10
Effects of one long vs. two short resistance training sessions on training volume and affective responses in resistance-trained women.一次长时间与两次短时间抗阻训练对有抗阻训练经验女性的训练量及情感反应的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1010596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010596. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of acute affective responses, physiological measures and training volume between superset and traditional resistance training in untrained adults.未经训练的成年人进行超级组训练与传统阻力训练时的急性情感反应、生理指标及训练量比较。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jan 17;7:1536747. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1536747. eCollection 2025.
2
How do rest-pause and sarcoplasma stimulating training models affect metabolic and psychoaffective responses in bodybuilding athletes compared to traditional training?与传统训练相比,休息-暂停训练和肌浆刺激训练模式如何影响健美运动员的代谢和心理情感反应?
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Oct 29;6:1467762. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1467762. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing affective valence and activation in resistance training with the feeling scale and the felt arousal scale: A systematic review.
使用感觉量表和感觉唤醒量表评估抗阻训练中的情感效价和激活:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294529. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers.比较手指屈肌抗阻训练,有和没有血流限制,对高级攀岩者的感知和生理反应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x.
5
Effects of one long vs. two short resistance training sessions on training volume and affective responses in resistance-trained women.一次长时间与两次短时间抗阻训练对有抗阻训练经验女性的训练量及情感反应的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1010596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010596. eCollection 2022.
6
A Comparison of Affective Responses Between Time Efficient and Traditional Resistance Training.高效训练与传统阻力训练的情感反应比较
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:912368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912368. eCollection 2022.
7
Methods for Controlling and Reporting Resistance Training Proximity to Failure: Current Issues and Future Directions.控制和报告抗阻训练接近力竭的方法:当前问题与未来方向。
Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1461-1472. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01667-2. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
Loading Recommendations for Muscle Strength, Hypertrophy, and Local Endurance: A Re-Examination of the Repetition Continuum.肌肉力量、肥大和局部耐力的负荷建议:对重复次数连续体的重新审视。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;9(2):32. doi: 10.3390/sports9020032.
9
The Effects of Low-Load Vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis.低负荷与高负荷抗阻训练对肌纤维肥大的影响:一项荟萃分析
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:51-58. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0013. eCollection 2020 Aug.