Department of Nephrology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Nephrology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM/FJD, Madrid, Spain.
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2019;44(5):907-914. doi: 10.1159/000501035. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Reactions to dialyzers used in dialysis have been reported more frequently in recent years. Evidence, however, shows that the reaction rate has remained stable for years.
One explanation for the apparent increase in publication frequency could be the lack of knowledge that dialyzer reactions may well occur with biocompatible membranes. Studies showed that the cause of these reactions is very diverse and varied, involving multiple materials. However, polyvinylpyrrolidone continues to be the main suspect, but without conclusive results. There are no differences between the different fibers, and although polysulfone is the most described, it is also the most used. Key Messages: The change to cellulose triacetate continues to be the most appropriate form of treatment. The classification of these reactions into type A and B complicates the diagnosis, and its true usefulness is in doubt.
近年来,透析中使用的透析器的反应报道更为频繁。然而,有证据表明,这种反应的发生率多年来一直保持稳定。
这种明显的发表频率增加的一个解释可能是缺乏认识,即透析器反应可能会与生物相容性膜一起发生。研究表明,这些反应的原因非常多样化和不同,涉及多种材料。然而,聚乙烯吡咯烷酮仍然是主要的嫌疑人,但没有确凿的结果。不同纤维之间没有差异,尽管聚砜是描述最多的,但也是使用最多的。
继续改用三醋酸纤维素仍然是最合适的治疗形式。将这些反应分为 A 型和 B 型使诊断变得复杂,其真正的用途也值得怀疑。