• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患有唐氏综合征的共同研究人员一起进行参与式数据分析。

Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome.

机构信息

Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/jar.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12080
PMID:24293223
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is comparatively little published research that transparently charts the contribution of people with an intellectual disability to a collaborative research process. This paper illustrates the process of data analysis in a project located within the Emancipatory Disability Research (EDR) paradigm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Textual data was made available from a participatory action research project involving young people who have Down syndrome. A university based researcher analysed a portion of the data set using thematic networks with the participation of co-researchers in iterative cycles of reflexivity.

RESULTS

The participation of the co-researchers is demonstrated and a global theme, deduced from the collaborative analysis, is described.

CONCLUSION

Authentic participation of co-researchers in the data analysis stage of the research process is an example of 'inclusive research' and assures adherence to the principles of EDR in informing the theory and practice of social inclusion for young adults with an intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND

There are not many research projects which include people with an intellectual disability in data analysis. This paper tells the story of how a small group of people with Down syndrome called co-researchers, joined in analysing data from their peers in a research project.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The co-researchers worked in a group. They took some copies of typed up interviews, underlined words and made notes on parts of the interview they found interesting and important.

RESULTS

Through their work, the co-researchers found that being involved with other people and having friends is important but can be hard sometimes.

CONCLUSION

This work is important as it shows the abilities of some people with Down syndrome in data analysis work. The co-researchers were included in research that is about themselves and other people with intellectual disabilities.

摘要

背景

很少有发表的研究能够透明地展示智障人士对协作研究过程的贡献。本文展示了一项位于解放残疾研究范式内的项目的数据分析过程。

材料与方法

参与唐氏综合征青年的参与式行动研究项目提供了文本数据。一名基于大学的研究人员使用主题网络分析了部分数据集,共同研究人员在反思性迭代循环中参与其中。

结果

展示了共同研究人员的参与,并描述了从协作分析中推断出的一个总体主题。

结论

共同研究人员在研究过程的数据分析阶段的真实参与是“包容性研究”的一个例子,并确保了在告知智力残疾青年社会包容的理论和实践时,遵循解放残疾研究的原则。

背景

很少有研究项目将智障人士纳入数据分析中。本文讲述了一个由几名唐氏综合征患者组成的小组,称为共同研究人员,他们如何参与分析一个研究项目中同龄人的数据。

材料与方法

共同研究人员以小组形式工作。他们复印了一些采访记录,在他们认为有趣和重要的采访部分下划线并做了笔记。

结果

通过他们的工作,共同研究人员发现参与他人和拥有朋友很重要,但有时也很困难。

结论

这项工作很重要,因为它展示了一些唐氏综合征患者在数据分析工作中的能力。共同研究人员参与了与自身和其他智障人士有关的研究。

相似文献

1
Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome.与患有唐氏综合征的共同研究人员一起进行参与式数据分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/jar.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
2
Co-researching with people who have intellectual disabilities: insights from a national survey.与智障人士共同研究:全国性调查的启示。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):65-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
3
A collaborative group method of inclusive research.协作式包容性研究方法。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/jar.12082. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability.将智障人士纳入研究的概念化。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/jar.12083. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Building an inclusive research team: the importance of team building and skills training.建设包容性研究团队:团队建设和技能培训的重要性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/jar.12076. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
6
Reflections on a participatory project: the rewards and challenges for the lead researchers.关于一个参与式项目的思考:首席研究员的收获与挑战
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011 Mar;36(1):39-48. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.548753. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
7
Inclusive research: making a difference to policy and legislation.包容性研究:对政策和立法产生影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12085. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
8
Participatory action research and young adults with psychiatric disabilities.参与行动研究与有精神障碍的青年。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Winter;35(3):231-4. doi: 10.2975/35.3.2012.231.234.
9
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disability.识别爱尔兰智障人士的主要担忧。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):564-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12099. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
A participatory group process to analyze qualitative data.一个用于分析定性数据的参与式小组过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):161-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0010.

引用本文的文献

1
"We Have a Ways to Go, but I Think You've Taken the Steps to Get Us There": Engaging Community Partners in Qualitative Analysis Using the RADaR Technique.“我们还有很长的路要走,但我认为你已经迈出了让我们实现目标的步伐”:运用RADaR技术让社区合作伙伴参与定性分析
Int J Qual Methods. 2025 Jan-Dec;24. doi: 10.1177/16094069251328163. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
"We're all in this together": patient and public involvement and engagement in developing a new psychosocial intervention for adults with an intellectual disability who display aggressive challenging behaviour.“我们同舟共济”:患者及公众参与并投身于为表现出具有攻击性挑战行为的成年智障人士开发一种新的社会心理干预措施。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 6;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00675-6.
3
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.
在儿科人群中开展以患者为导向的研究:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
4
Including people with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities in research and evaluation teams: A scoping review of the empirical knowledge base.将智力和其他认知障碍者纳入研究与评估团队:实证知识库的范围综述
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul 18:17446295231189912. doi: 10.1177/17446295231189912.
5
Evaluating meaningful impact of Patient and Public Involvement: A Q methodology study among researchers and young people with a chronic condition.评估患者和公众参与的有意义影响:一项针对研究人员和慢性病青年的 Q 方法研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):712-720. doi: 10.1111/hex.13418. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Codesigning patient experience measures for and with children and young people with intellectual disability: a study protocol.为有智力障碍的儿童和青少年共同设计患者体验测量指标:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e050973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050973.
7
Assessment of Stakeholder Engagement in a Down Syndrome Research Study.唐氏综合征研究中利益相关者参与情况的评估
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021 Jan 19;8(1):64-67. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1777. eCollection 2021 Winter.
8
Patient and public involvement of young people with a chronic condition: lessons learned and practical tips from a large participatory program.慢性病青年患者及公众的参与:大型参与式项目的经验教训与实用建议
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 30;6:59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00234-1. eCollection 2020.
9
Lessons learned from participatory research to enhance client participation in long-term care research: a multiple case study.从参与式研究中汲取的经验教训,以提高客户对长期护理研究的参与度:一项多案例研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 1;6:27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00187-5. eCollection 2020.
10
Patient and Public Involvement of young people with a chronic condition in projects in health and social care: A scoping review.患者和公众参与慢性病青少年在卫生和社会保健项目中的作用:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):789-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.13069. Epub 2020 May 5.