University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Knoxville, and Nashville, Tennessee.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6896. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6896.
To develop a valid and reliable academic resilience scale for use in the didactic portion of the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum to identify those pharmacy students who have greater capacity to overcome academic adversity. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among first-year, second-year, and third-year pharmacy students to assess psychometric properties of a 30-item adapted academic resilience scale. Data were also collected using the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Demographic characteristics were collected from student records. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to determine the number of underlying factors responsible for data covariation. Principal components analysis was used as the extraction method. Varimax rotation method was used, and the Cronbach alpha was estimated. Validity testing was conducted by calculating Pearson's correlations between the adapted academic resilience scale and Grit-S. The survey response rate was 84%. The final version of the scale, the Academic Pharmacy Resilience Scale (APRS-16), had four subscales and 16 items (14 items failed to load on any of the factors and were deleted). The Cronbach alpha was .84, indicating strong internal consistency. The APRS-16 and its subscales were significantly correlated to the Grit-S and its subscales, providing evidence of effective convergent validity. Evidence supports the reliability and validity of the APRS-16 as a measure of academic resilience in pharmacy students. Future studies should use the APRS-16 to investigate the relationship between academic resilience and performance outcomes among pharmacy students.
为了在药学博士课程的教学部分开发一个有效的和可靠的学术韧性量表,以确定那些有更大能力克服学术逆境的药学学生。在一年级、二年级和三年级药学学生中进行了横断面调查,以评估 30 项适应学术韧性量表的心理测量特性。还使用简短的毅力量表(Grit-S)收集了数据。从学生记录中收集了人口统计学特征。应用探索性因素分析确定负责数据协变的潜在因素的数量。使用主成分分析作为提取方法。使用方差极大旋转方法,并估计 Cronbach 阿尔法。通过计算适应学术韧性量表与 Grit-S 之间的 Pearson 相关来进行有效性测试。调查的回复率为 84%。量表的最终版本,即学术药学韧性量表(APRS-16),有四个分量表和 16 个项目(14 个项目未能加载到任何因素上并被删除)。Cronbach 阿尔法为.84,表明具有很强的内部一致性。APRS-16 及其分量表与 Grit-S 及其分量表显著相关,提供了有效收敛有效性的证据。证据支持 APRS-16 作为衡量药学学生学术韧性的可靠和有效的工具。未来的研究应该使用 APRS-16 来研究学术韧性与药学学生表现结果之间的关系。