• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务难度调节口呼吸对视觉搜索表现的干扰作用。

Task Difficulty Modulates the Disrupting Effects of Oral Respiration on Visual Search Performance.

作者信息

Yoshimura Naoto, Yonemitsu Fumiya, Marmolejo-Ramos Fernando, Ariga Atsunori, Yamada Yuki

机构信息

Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, JP.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, JP.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2019 Aug 2;2(1):21. doi: 10.5334/joc.77.

DOI:10.5334/joc.77
PMID:31517239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6676927/
Abstract

Previous research has suggested that oral respiration may disturb cognitive function and health. The present study investigated whether oral respiration negatively affects visual attentional processing during a visual search task. Participants performed a visual search task in the following three breathing conditions: wearing a nasal plug, wearing surgical tape over their mouths, or no modification (oral vs. nasal vs. control). The participants searched for a target stimulus within different set sizes of distractors in three search conditions (orientation vs colour vs conjunction). Experiment 1 did not show any effect due to respiration. Experiment 2 rigorously manipulated the search efficiency and found that participants required more time to find a poorly discriminable target during oral breathing compared with other breathing styles, which was due to the heightened intercept under this condition. Because the intercept is an index of pre-search sensory processing or motor response in visual search, such cognitive processing was likely disrupted by oral respiration. These results suggest that oral respiration and attentional processing during inefficient visual search share a common cognitive resource.

摘要

先前的研究表明,口呼吸可能会干扰认知功能和健康。本研究调查了在视觉搜索任务中,口呼吸是否会对视觉注意力加工产生负面影响。参与者在以下三种呼吸条件下执行视觉搜索任务:佩戴鼻塞、用手术胶带封住嘴巴或不做改变(口呼吸与鼻呼吸与对照)。参与者在三种搜索条件(方向与颜色与联合)下,在不同数量的干扰项中搜索目标刺激。实验1未显示出呼吸带来的任何影响。实验2严格控制了搜索效率,发现与其他呼吸方式相比,参与者在口呼吸时找到难以区分的目标需要更多时间,这是由于在此条件下截距增加所致。因为截距是视觉搜索中搜索前感觉加工或运动反应的指标,所以这种认知加工可能受到了口呼吸的干扰。这些结果表明,在低效视觉搜索过程中,口呼吸和注意力加工共享一种共同的认知资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ecdc61d81795/joc-2-1-77-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/439174866747/joc-2-1-77-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/054ef160e846/joc-2-1-77-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ba79ce472424/joc-2-1-77-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/60654bfc7c0b/joc-2-1-77-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ea3faee830d2/joc-2-1-77-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/17f2f4f29488/joc-2-1-77-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ecdc61d81795/joc-2-1-77-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/439174866747/joc-2-1-77-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/054ef160e846/joc-2-1-77-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ba79ce472424/joc-2-1-77-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/60654bfc7c0b/joc-2-1-77-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ea3faee830d2/joc-2-1-77-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/17f2f4f29488/joc-2-1-77-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3451/6676927/ecdc61d81795/joc-2-1-77-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
Task Difficulty Modulates the Disrupting Effects of Oral Respiration on Visual Search Performance.任务难度调节口呼吸对视觉搜索表现的干扰作用。
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 2;2(1):21. doi: 10.5334/joc.77.
2
Slower attentional disengagement but faster perceptual processing near the hand.手部附近注意力脱离较慢,但知觉加工较快。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Mar;174:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
3
Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.搜索效率不足:搜索的性质调节刺激驱动的注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):61-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1598-4.
4
More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.对双重任务中反应选择与视觉注意相互作用的更多洞察:掩蔽视觉搜索和反应选择是并行进行的。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):459-475. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0906-2. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
5
Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.当视觉搜索中对系列项目选择的要求很高时,视觉注意力和中枢注意力存在容量限制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):715-728. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01903-4.
6
Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.在费力的视觉搜索过程中,认知负荷会调节颜色单一元素对注意力的捕获。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Sep;135(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 31.
7
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
8
Attentional guidance during visual search among patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者视觉搜索中的注意力引导。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Sep;131(1-3):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.026. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
9
Attentional limits in visual search with and without dorsal parietal dysfunction: space-based window or object-based span?有和无背侧顶叶功能障碍的视觉搜索中的注意限制:基于空间的窗口还是基于对象的跨度?
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Oct 15;161:108013. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108013. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search?注意加权:视觉搜索中视野不对称的一种可能解释?
Spat Vis. 2004;17(4-5):269-93. doi: 10.1163/1568568041920203.

引用本文的文献

1
Change-detection training and its effects on visual processing skills.变化检测训练及其对视觉处理技能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 25;12(1):12646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15649-x.
2
Beyond Looking for the Rewarded Target: The Effects of Reward on Attention in Search Tasks.超越寻找奖励目标:奖励对搜索任务中注意力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 17;12:632442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632442. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
3
Respiratory modulation of cognitive performance during the retrieval process.在检索过程中,呼吸对认知表现的调节。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0204021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204021. eCollection 2018.
4
Nasal Respiration Entrains Human Limbic Oscillations and Modulates Cognitive Function.鼻腔呼吸同步人类边缘系统振荡并调节认知功能。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12448-12467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-16.2016.
5
Search efficiency as a function of target saliency: The transition from inefficient to efficient search and beyond.作为目标显著性函数的搜索效率:从不高效搜索到高效搜索及更高阶段的转变。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):821-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000156. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex.前额叶皮层中基于特征的注意力来源。
Neuron. 2015 Nov 18;88(4):832-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
7
Sleep breathing disorders and cognitive function in the elderly: an 8-year follow-up study. the proof-synapse cohort.老年人睡眠呼吸障碍与认知功能:一项8年随访研究。普罗夫-突触队列研究。
Sleep. 2015 Feb 1;38(2):179-87. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4392.
8
Deficits in working memory, reading comprehension and arithmetic skills in children with mouth breathing syndrome: analytical cross-sectional study.口呼吸综合征患儿的工作记忆、阅读理解和算术技能缺陷:分析性横断面研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Mar-Apr;133(2):78-83. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.7630011. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
9
jsPsych: a JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser.jsPsych:一个在网页浏览器中创建行为实验的 JavaScript 库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.
10
Increased oxygen load in the prefrontal cortex from mouth breathing: a vector-based near-infrared spectroscopy study.经口呼吸导致前额叶皮质氧负荷增加:一项基于矢量的近红外光谱研究。
Neuroreport. 2013 Dec 4;24(17):935-40. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000008.