• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为目标显著性函数的搜索效率:从不高效搜索到高效搜索及更高阶段的转变。

Search efficiency as a function of target saliency: The transition from inefficient to efficient search and beyond.

作者信息

Liesefeld Heinrich René, Moran Rani, Usher Marius, Müller Hermann J, Zehetleitner Michael

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München.

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):821-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000156. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000156
PMID:26727018
Abstract

Searching for an object among distracting objects is a common daily task. These searches differ in efficiency. Some are so difficult that each object must be inspected in turn, whereas others are so easy that the target object directly catches the observer's eye. In 4 experiments, the difficulty of searching for an orientation-defined target was parametrically manipulated between blocks of trials via the target-distractor orientation contrast. We observed a smooth transition from inefficient to efficient search with increasing orientation contrast. When contrast was high, search slopes were flat (indicating pop-out); when contrast was low, slopes were steep (indicating serial search). At the transition from inefficient to efficient search, search slopes were flat for target-present trials and steep for target-absent trials within the same orientation-contrast block-suggesting that participants adapted their behavior on target-absent trials to the most difficult, rather than the average, target-present trials of each block. Furthermore, even when search slopes were flat, indicative of pop-out, search continued to become faster with increasing contrast. These observations provide several new constraints for models of visual search and indicate that differences between search tasks that were traditionally considered qualitative in nature might actually be due to purely quantitative differences in target discriminability. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在干扰物体中寻找目标物体是一项常见的日常任务。这些搜索在效率上存在差异。有些搜索非常困难,以至于必须逐个检查每个物体,而另一些则非常容易,以至于目标物体能直接吸引观察者的目光。在4项实验中,通过目标与干扰物的方向对比度,在不同的试验组块之间对寻找方向定义目标的难度进行了参数化操作。我们观察到,随着方向对比度的增加,搜索从低效到高效呈现出平滑的转变。当对比度高时,搜索斜率平缓(表明弹出式搜索);当对比度低时,斜率陡峭(表明系列搜索)。在从低效搜索到高效搜索的转变过程中,在同一方向对比度组块内,目标存在试验的搜索斜率平缓,而目标缺失试验的搜索斜率陡峭——这表明参与者在目标缺失试验中将其行为调整为适应每个组块中最困难的目标存在试验,而非平均难度的目标存在试验。此外,即使搜索斜率平缓,表明是弹出式搜索,随着对比度增加,搜索速度仍会继续加快。这些观察结果为视觉搜索模型提供了几个新的限制条件,并表明传统上被认为本质上是定性的搜索任务之间的差异,实际上可能仅仅是由于目标可辨别性的纯粹定量差异所致。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )

相似文献

1
Search efficiency as a function of target saliency: The transition from inefficient to efficient search and beyond.作为目标显著性函数的搜索效率:从不高效搜索到高效搜索及更高阶段的转变。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):821-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000156. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task.在视觉搜索任务中,更快地识别具有特定方向的可抓取目标。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Apr;238(4):905-916. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05769-z. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.空间和非空间工作记忆过程在视觉搜索中的作用。
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(5):301-12. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.301.
4
Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.向注意模板添加细节可抵消搜索难度:来自对侧延迟活动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):429-437. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000367.
5
Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.学习抑制目标维度中的显著干扰物:基于区域的抑制是持久的,并转移到非目标维度中的干扰物。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2080-2097. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000691. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
7
Perceptual target discriminability modulates the Simon effect beyond the fading of distractor-based activation: Insights from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.感知目标可辨别性对西蒙效应的调节作用超越基于干扰项激活的消退:来自增量图和扩散模型分析的见解。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Aug;50(8):842-858. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001211. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
8
Quantitative and qualitative differences in the top-down guiding attributes of visual search.自上而下的视觉搜索引导属性的数量和质量差异。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):942-964. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000764. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.视觉搜索中的决策过程作为目标出现概率的函数。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1466-76. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000248. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.显著性会增加干扰吗?搜索物体时的突出性和眼睛落点位置。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1088-98. doi: 10.1080/17470210802602433. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The precision of attention selection during reward learning influences the mechanisms of value-driven attention.奖励学习过程中注意力选择的精确性会影响价值驱动型注意力的机制。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 30;10(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00342-1.
2
Restoring a top-down control assumption: Salience effects in working memory are overcome with time.恢复自上而下的控制假设:工作记忆中的突显效应会随时间而克服。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Aug;154(8):2301-2317. doi: 10.1037/xge0001776. Epub 2025 May 15.
3
Noise correlations and neuronal diversity may limit the utility of winner-take-all readout in a pop out visual search task.
噪声相关性和神经元多样性可能会限制“赢家通吃”读出机制在弹出式视觉搜索任务中的效用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 7;21(5):e1013092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013092. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Salient objects in a scene trigger enhanced perceptual selection and memory encoding.场景中的显著物体会触发增强的感知选择和记忆编码。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 26:2025.03.25.645146. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.25.645146.
5
Visual statistical learning requires attention.视觉统计学习需要注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1240-1253. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02605-1. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
6
Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.追踪听觉刺激下空间注意的错误分配和再分配。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jul 24;44(30):e2196232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2196-23.2024.
7
Multisensory visuo-tactile context learning enhances the guidance of unisensory visual search.多感觉视触上下文学习增强了单感觉视觉搜索的引导。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 3;11(1):9439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88946-6.
8
Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?目标-情境关联的跨模态学习:触觉情境何时能预测视觉搜索?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1682-1694. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01907-0.
9
Task Difficulty Modulates the Disrupting Effects of Oral Respiration on Visual Search Performance.任务难度调节口呼吸对视觉搜索表现的干扰作用。
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 2;2(1):21. doi: 10.5334/joc.77.
10
Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.视觉突显搜索中的试验间效应:贝叶斯更新模型的析因比较。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jul 30;14(7):e1006328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006328. eCollection 2018 Jul.