Department of Research, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Health Education, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 30;27(3):172-176. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_241_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
The purpose was to compare vision and ocular disease among orphans to age-matched school children and determine the barriers they faced for ophthalmic care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Children of four orphanages of Riyadh (Gr1) were screened for vision refractive error (RE) and eye ailment on "World Sight Day-2019." They were compared to age-matched school children (comparison group; Gr2). The rates of RE, strabismus, amblyopia, and allergic conjunctivitis were estimated in two groups. The coverage of existing eye services for orphan children was reviewed.
We screened 53 children of Gr1 and 106 school children of Gr2. The risk of RE was statistically significantly higher in school children compared to orphan children (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2; 4.8] = 0.01). The coverage of refractive services for Gr1 was significantly lower than for Gr2 (OR = 0.09 [95% CI 0.02; 0.4] = 0.001). In Gr1, blurry vision (12 children), red eye (2), and itchy eyes (1) were the main symptoms. In Gr2, no child had eye complaints. In Gr1, amblyopia (1), strabismus (1), history of ocular trauma and surgery (1), eye medications needed (2), and systemic health problems were noted in 9 children. In Gr2, amblyopia (4), strabismus (4), and history of ocular surgery were noted in 2 children.
Orphan children had less rate of myopia compared to school children. However, unattended ocular pathologies were detected during the screening campaign. The coverage of refractive services was low in these underprivileged children compared to school children.
本研究旨在比较沙特利雅得孤儿院儿童与年龄匹配的在校儿童的视力和眼部疾病,并确定他们在获得眼科保健方面面临的障碍。
在“2019 年世界视觉日”,对利雅得的四所孤儿院的儿童(第 1 组,Gr1)进行视力屈光不正(RE)和眼部疾病筛查,并与年龄匹配的在校儿童(对照组;第 2 组,Gr2)进行比较。在两组中估计屈光不正、斜视、弱视和过敏性结膜炎的发生率。审查现有的针对孤儿院儿童的眼科服务覆盖情况。
我们共筛查了 Gr1 的 53 名儿童和 Gr2 的 106 名在校儿童。在校儿童的屈光不正风险明显高于孤儿院儿童(比值比 [OR] = 2.4 [95%置信区间(CI)1.2; 4.8] = 0.01)。Gr1 的屈光服务覆盖率明显低于 Gr2(OR = 0.09 [95% CI 0.02; 0.4] = 0.001)。在 Gr1 中,12 名儿童有视力模糊、2 名儿童有眼红、1 名儿童有眼痒的症状。在 Gr2 中,没有儿童有眼部不适。在 Gr1 中,9 名儿童有弱视(1 例)、斜视(1 例)、眼部创伤和手术史(1 例)、需要眼部用药(2 例)和全身健康问题。在 Gr2 中,2 名儿童有斜视(4 例)、弱视(4 例)和眼部手术史。
与在校儿童相比,孤儿院儿童的近视率较低。然而,在筛查活动中发现了未得到治疗的眼部疾病。与在校儿童相比,这些贫困儿童的屈光服务覆盖率较低。