• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European.多基因遗传性癌症检测中的不平等现象:与欧洲人相比,自认为是西班牙裔、非裔或亚太裔的个体的诊断产量较低,VUS 率较高。
Fam Cancer. 2019 Oct;18(4):465-469. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00144-6.
2
Ethnic disparities among men with prostate cancer undergoing germline testing.男性前列腺癌患者进行种系检测的种族差异。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):80.e1-80.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Recent breast cancer trends among Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and African-American women in the US: changes by tumor subtype.美国亚裔/太平洋岛民、西班牙裔和非裔美国女性近期的乳腺癌发病趋势:按肿瘤亚型划分的变化
Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):R90. doi: 10.1186/bcr1839.
4
Head and Neck Cancer Stage at Presentation and Survival Outcomes Among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Patients Compared With Asian and White Patients.头颈部癌症患者的就诊时分期和生存结局在夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民患者与亚裔和白人患者中的比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jul 1;148(7):636-645. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1086.
5
Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.遗传性疾病基因检测中不确定意义变异的发生率和分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare-associated infections in the United States, 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年美国医疗保健相关感染中的种族和族裔差异
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;35 Suppl 3:S10-6. doi: 10.1086/677827.
7
Ancestry-specific hereditary cancer panel yields: Moving toward more personalized risk assessment.基于家族遗传的癌症基因检测面板:朝着更个性化的风险评估迈进。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):598-606. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1257. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Racial and ethnic variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results among individuals referred for genetic counseling at a large urban comprehensive cancer center.在一家大型城市综合癌症中心接受遗传咨询的个体中,BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测结果的种族和民族差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Feb;34(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01648-w. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
9
Racial inequities in U.S. naloxone prescriptions.美国纳洛酮处方中的种族不平等现象。
Subst Abus. 2020;41(2):232-244. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1686721. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Postpartum hemorrhage outcomes and race.产后出血结局与种族。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):185.e1-185.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.052. Epub 2018 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiplexed assays of variant effect for clinical variant interpretation.用于临床变异解读的变异效应多重检测。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00870-x.
2
High burden of variants of uncertain significance in early-onset colorectal cancer among indigenous African patients: a call for global research equity in cancer genetics.非洲本土患者早发性结直肠癌中意义未明变异的高负担:呼吁癌症遗传学领域的全球研究公平性。
Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jul 8;52(1):684. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10750-6.
3
Geno4ME Study: implementation of whole genome sequencing for population screening in a large healthcare system.Geno4ME研究:在大型医疗保健系统中实施全基因组测序用于人群筛查。
NPJ Genom Med. 2025 Jul 1;10(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41525-025-00508-1.
4
Exploring the role of germline genetic testing in surgical decision making for early-stage invasive breast cancer: insights from a safety-net hospital.探索生殖系基因检测在早期浸润性乳腺癌手术决策中的作用:来自一家安全网医院的见解。
J Community Genet. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00806-2.
5
Imprecision medicine: Systematic gaps in reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and their reclassifications.精准医学:报告意义未明变异(VUS)及其重新分类方面的系统性差距。
Genet Med. 2025 Jun 18;27(9):101501. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101501.
6
A series of reviews in familial cancer: genetic cancer risk in context variants of uncertain significance in MMR genes: which procedures should be followed?一系列关于家族性癌症的综述:错配修复(MMR)基因中意义不确定的背景变异的遗传性癌症风险:应遵循哪些程序?
Fam Cancer. 2025 May 3;24(2):42. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00470-y.
7
The Art and Science of Genetic Counseling in Nephrology.肾脏病学中遗传咨询的艺术与科学
Kidney360. 2025 Apr 23;6(7):1230-1244. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000825.
8
Universal Genetic Counseling and Testing for Black Women: A Risk-Stratified Approach to Addressing Breast Cancer Disparities.黑人女性的通用遗传咨询与检测:一种解决乳腺癌差异的风险分层方法。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2025 Apr;25(3):193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.11.024. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
9
Reflections on my international genetic counseling rotations: Contrasts in practice between India and the United States.关于我在国际遗传咨询轮转经历的思考:印度与美国实践中的对比。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Jul 20;2(Suppl 2):101871. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101871. eCollection 2024.
10
Implementation of Universal Germline Genetic Testing Into Standard of Care for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Time Is Now.将通用种系基因检测纳入前列腺癌患者的标准治疗:时机已到。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun;21(6):747-753. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00626. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients.基于人群的乳腺癌患者和卵巢癌患者队列中的基因检测和结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1305-1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01854. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
A scalable, aggregated genotypic-phenotypic database for human disease variation.可扩展的、聚合的人类疾病变异基因表型综合数据库。
Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019:baz013. doi: 10.1093/database/baz013.
3
A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究的科学计量学综述。
Commun Biol. 2019 Jan 7;2:9. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0261-x. eCollection 2019.
4
Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.遗传性癌症基因检测后变异再分类的流行率。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1266-1274. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13152.
5
Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening.尽管普遍开展了结直肠癌筛查,但在不同种族和民族的患者中,遗传检测的转诊率仍然较低。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;16(12):1911-1918.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
Racial/ethnic differences in multiple-gene sequencing results for hereditary cancer risk.种族/民族差异与遗传性癌症风险的多基因测序结果。
Genet Med. 2018 Feb;20(2):234-239. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.96. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.对60706名人类的蛋白质编码基因变异进行分析。
Nature. 2016 Aug 18;536(7616):285-91. doi: 10.1038/nature19057.
8
Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.使用多基因检测板评估种族多样化临床队列中的遗传性癌症易感性时可操作突变的产量增加。
Cancer Genet. 2016 Apr;209(4):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.序列变异解读的标准与指南:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会和分子病理学协会的联合共识推荐
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.一项关于非裔美国人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民参与少数族裔研究的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

多基因遗传性癌症检测中的不平等现象:与欧洲人相比,自认为是西班牙裔、非裔或亚太裔的个体的诊断产量较低,VUS 率较高。

Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European.

机构信息

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, PO BOX 357720, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Fam Cancer. 2019 Oct;18(4):465-469. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00144-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10689-019-00144-6
PMID:31531760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6785397/
Abstract

The identification of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in cancer predisposition genes can guide treatment and management decisions for the individual being tested and potentially at-risk relatives. Prior studies have raised concerns of racial/ethnic disparities in the detection rates of P/LP variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). In 2018, Color Genomics™, a commercial laboratory, made de-identified, aggregate genetic and clinical information from 50,000 individuals who completed testing for 30 cancer predisposition genes publicly available. It is the largest publicly available database of its kind from a single laboratory. An analysis of individuals from this database with a negative personal history of cancer that identify as European (n = 31,920), Hispanic (n = 1700), African (n = 462) or Asian and Pacific Islander (n = 2602), demonstrated that the VUS rate in the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome genes was higher for all non-European groups as compared to the European group; Hispanic (7.1% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.029), African (12.3% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001), Asian and Pacific Islander (13.1% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001). In the other cancer genes (OCGs), the P/LP rate was lower; Hispanic (5.1% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001), African (2.4% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001), and Asian and Pacific Islander (4.3% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001). The VUS rate was also higher in the OCGs; Hispanic (16.2% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001), African (21.6% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001), Asian and Pacific Islander (24.4% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001). Our study emphasizes the reality of disparities in the results of cancer genetic testing and highlights factors that propagate these inequities.

摘要

胚系致病性/可能致病性(P/LP)变异的鉴定可以指导接受检测个体和潜在高危亲属的治疗和管理决策。先前的研究表明,在 P/LP 变异和意义不明的变异(VUS)的检出率方面存在种族/民族差异。2018 年,Color Genomics™,一家商业实验室,公开提供了来自 50,000 名完成 30 种癌症易感性基因检测的个体的去识别、综合遗传和临床信息。这是来自单一实验室的同类中最大的公开可用数据库。对该数据库中个人癌症史阴性且自认为是欧洲人(n=31920)、西班牙裔(n=1700)、非洲人(n=462)或亚洲和太平洋岛民(n=2602)的分析表明,遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征以及林奇综合征基因的 VUS 率在所有非欧洲群体中均高于欧洲群体;西班牙裔(7.1%比 5.8%;p=0.029)、非洲人(12.3%比 5.8%;p<0.001)、亚洲和太平洋岛民(13.1%比 5.8%;p<0.001)。在其他癌症基因(OCGs)中,P/LP 率较低;西班牙裔(5.1%比 7.6%;p<0.001)、非洲裔(2.4%比 7.6%;p<0.001)和亚洲及太平洋岛民(4.3%比 7.6%;p<0.001)。OCGs 中的 VUS 率也较高;西班牙裔(16.2%比 12.2%;p<0.001)、非洲裔(21.6%比 12.2%;p<0.001)、亚洲和太平洋岛民(24.4%比 12.2%;p<0.001)。我们的研究强调了癌症基因检测结果存在差异的现实,并突出了导致这些不平等的因素。