Aspetar, Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sports City Street, Al Waab, Beverly Hills Garden 14, Villa 30, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.
Aspire Academy, Sports City Street, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.
Sports Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):55-72. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4.
Change of direction (CoD) has been indicated as a key mechanism in the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during invasion sports. Despite these associations, assessments of knee function in athletic populations at the time of return to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLr) have often focused on strength and single-leg hop tests, with a paucity of evidence to describe the CoD characteristics. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to describe the movement strategies exhibited following ACLr during CoD tasks and to critically analyze the range of tests that have been used. Specifically, we examined their ability to identify between-limb deficits and individuals who display a heightened risk of secondary injury and/or reductions in their level of pre-injury performance. MEDLINE, PubMed and SPORT Discuss databases were used and 13 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Examination of the available literature indicates that current field-based practices are not representative of relevant sport demands and are unable to effectively assess knee function following ACLr. Laboratory-based studies have identified residual deficits and altered movement strategies at the time of return to sport, and this in part may be related to risk of re-injury. However, these assessments exhibit inherent limitations and are not practically viable for monitoring progress during rehabilitation. Consequently, alternative solutions that are more-aligned with the multitude of factors occurring during CoD maneuvers in chaotic sports environments are warranted to allow practitioners to 'bridge the gap' between the laboratory and the sports field/court. This approach may facilitate a more informed decision-making process with the end goal being, a heightened 'return to performance' and a lower risk of re-injury.
变向(CoD)已被认为是侵袭性运动中前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤发生的关键机制。尽管存在这些关联,但在 ACL 重建(ACLr)后重返运动时,对运动人群的膝关节功能评估通常侧重于力量和单腿跳跃测试,缺乏描述 CoD 特征的证据。因此,本叙述性综述的目的是描述 ACLr 后 CoD 任务中表现出的运动策略,并批判性地分析已使用的测试范围。具体来说,我们检查了它们识别两腿之间缺陷的能力,以及那些表现出更高二次损伤风险和/或降低其术前表现水平的个体。使用 MEDLINE、PubMed 和 SPORT Discuss 数据库,确定了符合纳入标准的 13 篇文章。对现有文献的研究表明,目前基于现场的实践方法不能代表相关运动的需求,也不能有效地评估 ACLr 后的膝关节功能。基于实验室的研究已经确定了在重返运动时存在残余缺陷和改变的运动策略,这在一定程度上可能与再次受伤的风险有关。然而,这些评估存在内在的局限性,在康复期间监测进展时并不实用。因此,需要更符合混沌运动环境中 CoD 动作中发生的多种因素的替代解决方案,以使从业者能够在实验室和运动场/球场之间“弥合差距”。这种方法可以促进更明智的决策过程,最终目标是提高“重返表现”水平和降低再次受伤的风险。