Psychology Department, Brigham Young University.
Psychology Department, University of Utah.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):941-966. doi: 10.1177/1745691619861392. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
The protective influence of social relationships on health is widely documented; however, not all relationships are positive, and negative aspects of relationships may be detrimental. Much less is known about the relationships characterized by both positivity and negativity (i.e., ambivalence). This article provides a theoretical framework for considering the influence of ambivalent relationships on physical health, including reasons why ambivalence should be considered separately from relationships characterized as primarily positive (supportive) or primarily negative (aversive). We introduce the social ambivalence and disease (SAD) model as a guide to understanding the social psychological antecedents, processes, and consequences of ambivalent relationships. We conclude by highlighting gaps in the literature and features of the SAD model that may serve as a guide to future research on potential health-relevant pathways of ambivalent relationships.
社会关系对健康的保护作用已被广泛证实;然而,并非所有关系都是积极的,关系的消极方面可能是有害的。人们对同时具有积极性和消极性(即矛盾性)的关系知之甚少。本文提供了一个理论框架,用于研究矛盾关系对身体健康的影响,包括为什么应该将矛盾性与主要为积极(支持性)或主要为消极(厌恶性)的关系分别考虑的原因。我们引入了社会矛盾与疾病(SAD)模型,作为理解矛盾关系的社会心理前因、过程和后果的指南。最后,我们强调了文献中的空白和 SAD 模型的特点,这些可能为未来研究矛盾关系与潜在健康相关途径提供指导。