• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

X射线或中子诱发皮肤损伤的氧增强比(O.E.R.)、相对生物效应(R.B.E.)与分次照射次数之间的关系。

The relationship between o.e.r., r.b.e. and number of fractions for X-ray- or neutron-induced skin damage.

作者信息

Andreozzi U, Hornsey S, Myers R

出版信息

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1979 Jul;36(1):33-41. doi: 10.1080/09553007914550791.

DOI:10.1080/09553007914550791
PMID:315380
Abstract

The skin reactions in aerated and hypoxic mouse tails after single or fractionated doses of 250 kV X-rays or fast neutrons (6 MeV deuterons on beryllium) have been measured. The o.e.r. for one to sixteen fractions of X-rays remains constant, while that for one to ten fractions of neutrons decreases with increasing neutron fractionation and decreasing neutron dose/fraction. The o.e.r. for X-rays was 1.7, for single-neutron doses 1.4, and for ten fractions of neutrons 1.25. It was anticipated that the o.e.r. for neutron-induced damage would decrease further as neutron fractionation is increased because the contribution to damage from the highest LET components of dose, the alpha and heavy recoil particles, would increase relative to the lowe LET components. The r.b.e. values obtained for skin damage were higher at all neutron doses/fraction examined in this study on tails than all those previously obtained in studies on skin at other sites on four species. This may be due to the influence of hypoxia on the r.b.e. measurements in the mouse tail.

摘要

已测量了单次或分次给予250 kV X射线或快中子(铍上的6 MeV氘核)后,通气和缺氧小鼠尾巴的皮肤反应。X射线一至十六次分次照射的氧增强比保持恒定,而中子一至十次分次照射的氧增强比则随着中子分次增加和中子剂量/分次减少而降低。X射线的氧增强比为1.7,单次中子剂量的氧增强比为1.4,十次中子分次照射的氧增强比为1.25。预计随着中子分次增加,中子诱导损伤的氧增强比会进一步降低,因为剂量中高传能线密度成分(α粒子和重反冲粒子)对损伤的贡献相对于低传能线密度成分会增加。在本研究中对尾巴进行的所有中子剂量/分次检查中,获得的皮肤损伤相对生物效应值均高于之前在四种物种其他部位皮肤研究中获得的所有值。这可能是由于缺氧对小鼠尾巴相对生物效应测量的影响。

相似文献

1
The relationship between o.e.r., r.b.e. and number of fractions for X-ray- or neutron-induced skin damage.X射线或中子诱发皮肤损伤的氧增强比(O.E.R.)、相对生物效应(R.B.E.)与分次照射次数之间的关系。
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1979 Jul;36(1):33-41. doi: 10.1080/09553007914550791.
2
Tolerance of rodent tails to necrosis after "daily" fractionated X rays or D-T neutrons.“每日”分次X射线或D-T中子照射后啮齿动物尾巴对坏死的耐受性
Br J Radiol. 1976 Aug;49(584):690-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-49-584-690.
3
The RBE for mouse skin irradiated with 3-MeV neutrons: single and fractionated doses.3兆电子伏中子辐照小鼠皮肤的相对生物效应:单次和分次剂量
Radiat Res. 1983 Jul;95(1):130-41.
4
Damage to mouse lung with fractionated neutrons and x rays.分次中子和X射线对小鼠肺部的损伤。
Radiology. 1975 Jul;116(1):171-4. doi: 10.1148/116.1.171.
5
An historical survey of radiobiology and radiotherapy with fast neutrons.快中子放射生物学与放射治疗的历史综述。
Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 1976 Jan;11(1):1-86.
6
A comparison of the effects of p(62)-Be and d(16)-Be neutrons in the mouse kidney.p(62)-Be和d(16)-Be中子对小鼠肾脏影响的比较。
Radiother Oncol. 1988 Nov;13(3):211-24. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90058-8.
7
The response of mouse skin to irradiation with neutrons from the 62 MV cyclotron at Clatterbridge, U.K.英国克拉特布里奇62兆伏回旋加速器产生的中子对小鼠皮肤的辐照反应
Radiother Oncol. 1988 Jun;12(2):153-66. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90169-7.
8
Neutron RBEs for mouse skin at low doses per fraction.低分割剂量下小鼠皮肤的中子相对生物效应
Radiat Res. 1984 May;98(2):317-31.
9
The interaction between X-rays and 3 MeV neutrons in the skin of the mouse foot.X射线与3兆电子伏特中子在小鼠足部皮肤中的相互作用。
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1984 Nov;46(5):625-38. doi: 10.1080/09553008414551811.
10
Relative biological effectiveness and tolerance dose of fission neutrons in canine skin for a potential combination of neutron capture therapy and fast-neutron therapy.裂变中子在犬类皮肤中的相对生物效应和耐受剂量,用于中子俘获疗法和快中子疗法的潜在联合治疗
Radiat Res. 2003 Oct;160(4):436-42. doi: 10.1667/rr3056.