Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JCHO Hokkaido Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Sapporo, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e031839. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031839.
To determine whether an educational leaflet had any effect on seat belt use, seat preference and motor vehicle accidents rate during pregnancy in Japan.
Prospective, non-randomised control trial with a questionnaire survey.
Eight obstetric hospitals in Sapporo, Japan.
2216 pregnant women, of whom 1105 received the leaflet (intervention group) and 1111 did not (control group).
Distribution of an educational leaflet on seat belt use to women in the intervention group.
The effect of an educational leaflet on seat belt use, each pregnant woman's seat preference and the women's rates of motor vehicle accidents rate during their pregnancies. To evaluate the effects, the intervention group's responses to the questionnaires were compared with those of the control group.
The proportion of subjects who always used seat belts during pregnancy was significantly higher in the intervention group (91.3%) than in the control group (86.7%; p=0.0005). Among all subjects, the percentage of women who preferred the driver's seat was lower during pregnancy (27.0%) than before pregnancy (38.7%), and the percentage of women who preferred the rear seat was higher during pregnancy (28.8%) than before pregnancy (21.0%). These two rates did not differ between two groups. Seventy-one women (3.2%) reported experiencing a motor vehicle accident during pregnancy. The motor vehicle accident rate for the intervention group (3.3%) was similar to that for the control group (3.2%).
An educational seat belt leaflet was effective in raising the rate of consistent seat belt use during pregnancy, but it did not decrease the rate of motor vehicle accidents. The wearing of seat belts should be promoted more extensively among pregnant women to decrease rates of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle accidents.
确定在日本,教育传单是否会对孕妇安全带使用、座椅偏好和机动车事故率产生影响。
前瞻性、非随机对照试验,结合问卷调查。
日本札幌的 8 家产科医院。
2216 名孕妇,其中 1105 名接受了传单(干预组),1111 名未接受(对照组)。
向干预组的女性分发关于安全带使用的教育传单。
教育传单对安全带使用、每位孕妇座椅偏好以及女性在怀孕期间机动车事故率的影响。为了评估效果,将干预组对问卷的回答与对照组进行了比较。
在干预组中,怀孕期间始终使用安全带的受试者比例明显高于对照组(91.3%对 86.7%;p=0.0005)。在所有受试者中,怀孕期间选择驾驶座的女性比例(27.0%)低于怀孕前(38.7%),而怀孕期间选择后座的女性比例(28.8%)高于怀孕前(21.0%)。这两个比例在两组之间没有差异。71 名女性(3.2%)报告在怀孕期间发生机动车事故。干预组(3.3%)的机动车事故率与对照组(3.2%)相似。
教育安全带传单有效地提高了孕妇安全带使用的一致性,但并没有降低机动车事故的发生率。应更广泛地向孕妇宣传安全带的使用,以降低因机动车事故导致的妊娠相关发病率和死亡率。