Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS - Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, 13005, France; Laboratoire d'Informatique et Systèmes UMR 7020, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Marseille - Faculté des Sciences, 163 Avenue de Luminy, Case 901, Marseille, 13009, France.
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS - Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, 13005, France.
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1;204:116205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116205. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) has become vastly popular for analyzing functional neuroimaging data. At the group level, two main strategies are used in the literature. The standard one is hierarchical, combining the outcomes of within-subject decoding results in a second-level analysis. The alternative one, inter-subject pattern analysis, directly works at the group-level by using, e.g. a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. This study provides a thorough comparison of these two group-level decoding schemes, using both a large number of artificial datasets where the size of the multivariate effect and the amount of inter-individual variability are parametrically controlled, as well as two real fMRI datasets comprising 15 and 39 subjects, respectively. We show that these two strategies uncover distinct significant regions with partial overlap, and that inter-subject pattern analysis is able to detect smaller effects and to facilitate the interpretation. The core source code and data are openly available, allowing to fully reproduce most of these results.
多元模式分析(MVPA)在分析功能神经影像学数据方面变得非常流行。在组水平上,文献中使用了两种主要策略。标准的策略是分层的,将个体内解码结果的结果结合在第二级分析中。另一种替代策略是个体间模式分析,通过使用例如,对一个被试进行交叉验证。本研究使用大量人工数据集以及两个分别包含 15 和 39 个被试的真实 fMRI 数据集,对这两种组水平解码方案进行了彻底的比较。我们表明,这两种策略都能发现具有部分重叠的不同显著区域,并且个体间模式分析能够检测到较小的效果,并促进解释。核心源代码和数据是公开的,允许大部分结果都可以被完全复制。