Wolter Ilka, Ehrtmann Lisa, Seidel Tina, Drechsel Barbara
Competencies, Personality, Learning Environments, Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, Bamberg, Germany.
Friedl Schöller Endowed Chair for Educational Psychology, School of Education, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 13;10:2065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02065. eCollection 2019.
Various studies try to disentangle the gender-specific competencies or decisions that lead to a career in a STEM field and try to find a way to encourage more women to pursue this kind of career. The present study examines differences in the meaning of work (i.e., their professional goal orientation) of students who are enrolled in STEM or non-STEM programs in tertiary education. Based on the background that gender stereotypes associate women and men with communal or agentic roles respectively, we expected that women in STEM subjects differ in their professional goal orientation from women in non-STEM programs. More precisely, women who are enrolled in a STEM major are expected to be less oriented to social and communal goal orientations than women in non-STEM university programs. In a sample of 5,857 second-year university students of the German National Educational Panel Study, three profiles of professional goal orientation were confirmed in a latent profile analysis. As expected, women were more oriented toward social aspects of occupations, whereas men more likely belonged to a profile with high importance for economic aspects of occupations. Moreover, students enrolled in STEM programs more likely belonged to the profile of economic goal orientation. There was, however, no interaction of gender and STEM program: Women in STEM fields did not differ in their occupational goal orientation from women enrolled in non-STEM programs. Based on these findings and on a goal congruity perspective, future interventions aiming at overcoming the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields should consider the individual meaning of work and the goals that are associated with STEM occupations.
各种研究试图厘清导致人们投身于STEM领域职业的特定性别能力或决策,并试图找到鼓励更多女性追求这类职业的方法。本研究考察了高等教育中就读于STEM或非STEM专业的学生在工作意义(即他们的职业目标导向)方面的差异。基于性别刻板印象分别将女性和男性与社群型或进取型角色联系起来的背景,我们预期,STEM学科的女性在职业目标导向上与非STEM专业的女性有所不同。更确切地说,预计就读于STEM专业的女性比非STEM大学专业的女性对社会和社群目标导向的倾向更低。在德国国家教育面板研究的5857名二年级大学生样本中,通过潜在剖面分析确定了三种职业目标导向类型。正如预期的那样,女性更倾向于职业的社会方面,而男性更有可能属于对职业经济方面高度重视的类型。此外,就读于STEM专业的学生更有可能属于经济目标导向类型。然而,性别与STEM专业之间没有交互作用:STEM领域的女性在职业目标导向上与就读于非STEM专业的女性没有差异。基于这些发现以及目标一致性观点,未来旨在克服女性在STEM领域代表性不足问题的干预措施应考虑工作的个人意义以及与STEM职业相关的目标。