Dayal Parul, Chang Celia H, Benko William S, Ulmer Aaron M, Crossen Stephanie S, Pollock Brad H, Hoch Jeffrey S, Kissee Jamie L, Warner Leslie, Marcin James P
Department of Pediatrics (PD, SSC, JLK, JPM) and Department of Neurology (CHC, WSB), University of California Davis Health; Center for Health and Technology (AMU, JPM), University of California Davis Health; Department of Public Health Sciences (BHP, JSH), University of California Davis Health; Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (JSH), University of California Davis Health, Sacramento; and Shasta Community Health Center (LW), Redding, CA.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;9(4):314-321. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000649.
To determine whether telemedicine improves access to outpatient neurology care for underserved patients, we compared appointment completion between urban, in-person clinics and telemedicine clinics held in rural and underserved communities where neurology consultations are provided remotely.
In this retrospective study, we identified patients scheduled for outpatient care from UCDH pediatric neurologists between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2017, in person and by telemedicine. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from electronic medical records. We evaluated the association between consultation modality and visit completion in overall and matched samples using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression.
We analyzed 13,311 in-person appointments by 3,831 patients and 1,158 telemedicine appointments by 381 patients. The average travel time to the site of care was 45.8 ± 52.1 minutes for the in-person cohort and 22.3 ± 22.7 minutes for the telemedicine cohort. Telemedicine sites were located at an average travel time of 217.1 ± 114.8 minutes from UCDH. Telemedicine patients were more likely to have nonprivate insurance, lower education, and lower household income. They had different diagnoses and fewer complex chronic conditions. Telemedicine visits were more likely to be completed than either "cancelled" or missed ("no show") compared with in-person visits (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.83; OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31-2.10 matched on travel time to the site of care; OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.66-2.98 matched on travel time to UCDH).
The use of telemedicine for outpatient pediatric neurology visits has high odds of completion and can serve as an equal adjunct to in-person clinic visits.
为了确定远程医疗是否能改善医疗服务不足患者获得门诊神经科护理的机会,我们比较了城市面对面诊所与农村及医疗服务不足社区的远程医疗诊所(通过远程提供神经科会诊)的预约完成情况。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们确定了2009年1月1日至2017年7月31日期间加州大学戴维斯分校儿科神经科医生安排的门诊患者,包括面对面就诊和远程医疗就诊的患者。人口统计学和临床变量从电子病历中提取。我们使用分层多变量逻辑回归评估了总体样本和匹配样本中会诊方式与就诊完成情况之间的关联。
我们分析了3831名患者的13311次面对面预约和381名患者的1158次远程医疗预约。面对面就诊队列前往医疗机构的平均出行时间为45.8±52.1分钟,远程医疗队列的平均出行时间为22.3±22.7分钟。远程医疗诊所距离加州大学戴维斯分校的平均出行时间为217.1±114.8分钟。远程医疗患者更有可能拥有非私人保险、教育程度较低且家庭收入较低。他们的诊断不同,复杂慢性病较少。与面对面就诊相比,远程医疗就诊更有可能完成,而不是“取消”或错过(“未就诊”)(比值比1.57,95%置信区间:1.34 - 1.83;在前往医疗机构的出行时间匹配的情况下比值比1.66,95%置信区间:1.31 - 2.10;在前往加州大学戴维斯分校的出行时间匹配的情况下比值比2.22,95%置信区间:1.66 - 2.98)。
在门诊儿科神经科就诊中使用远程医疗有很高的完成几率,并且可以作为面对面诊所就诊的等效辅助方式。