• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Knowledge Sharing in Cancer Screening Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: Insights From the International Cancer Screening Network.评估高收入、中等收入和低收入国家癌症筛查中的知识共享:来自国际癌症筛查网络的见解
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Sep;5:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00202.
2
Understanding the Value of International Research Networks: An Evaluation of the International Cancer Screening Network of the US National Cancer Institute.理解国际研究网络的价值:对美国国立癌症研究所国际癌症筛查网络的评估
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Oct;5:1-12. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00197.
3
Income-Based Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Virtual Global Health Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Analysis.新冠疫情期间基于收入的虚拟全球卫生活动感知收益与挑战的差异:混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 7;27:e63066. doi: 10.2196/63066.
4
Exploring HIV/AIDS investigator perceptions of equity within research partnerships between low-and middle-income and high-income countries: a pilot survey.探索艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究者对中低收入和高收入国家间研究伙伴关系中公平性的看法:一项试点调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 1;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00977-9.
5
An Analysis of Contemporary Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials From Low/Middle-Income vs High-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家与高收入国家当代肿瘤随机临床试验分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):379-385. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7478.
6
Leadership and international collaboration on COVID-19 research: reducing the North-South divide?新冠病毒研究方面的领导力与国际合作:缩小南北差距?
Scientometrics. 2023 Jun 5:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04754-x.
7
A Comparison of the Expectations and Experiences of Medical Students From High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries Participating in Global Health Clinical Electives.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家参加全球健康临床选修课程的医学生的期望与经历比较
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):45-56. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1347510. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
The Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries' Perspective on Global Neurosurgery Collaborations.低收入和中等收入国家对全球神经外科合作的看法。
Neurosurgery. 2025 Jun 1;96(6):1290-1300. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003230. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
9
Establishing Sustainable Arthroscopy Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) through High-Income Country/LMIC Partnerships: A Qualitative Analysis.通过高收入国家与低收入和中等收入国家的伙伴关系在低收入和中等收入国家建立可持续的关节镜检查能力:一项定性分析。
JB JS Open Access. 2022 Jul 5;7(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00160. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
10
Exploring the Evolution of Research Connectivity and Funding in Global Neurosurgical Publications.探索全球神经外科出版物中研究连通性与资金的演变
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e90-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.029. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Elimination of cervical cancer in Latin America (Project ECHO-ELA): lessons from phase one of implementation.拉丁美洲消除宫颈癌项目(ECHO-ELA项目):实施第一阶段的经验教训
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Jul 24;47:e113. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.113. eCollection 2023.
2
Importance of International Networking and Comparative Research in Screening to Meet the Global Challenge of Cancer Control.国际网络和比较研究在癌症筛查中对于应对全球癌症控制挑战的重要性。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Feb;6:180-181. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00388.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Value of International Research Networks: An Evaluation of the International Cancer Screening Network of the US National Cancer Institute.理解国际研究网络的价值:对美国国立癌症研究所国际癌症筛查网络的评估
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Oct;5:1-12. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00197.
2
Cancer Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Is It Time to Consider Screening?低收入和中等收入国家的癌症控制:是时候考虑筛查了吗?
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Mar;5:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00200.
3
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.利用 HPV 自我采样检测来发现宫颈癌前病变并覆盖未筛查人群:更新的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4823. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4823.
5
Global cancer control: responding to the growing burden, rising costs and inequalities in access.全球癌症控制:应对日益加重的负担、不断上升的成本以及获取资源方面的不平等现象。
ESMO Open. 2018 Feb 2;3(2):e000285. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000285. eCollection 2018.
6
Population-based cancer screening programmes in low-income and middle-income countries: regional consultation of the International Cancer Screening Network in India.基于人群的癌症筛查计划在低收入和中等收入国家:国际癌症筛查网络在印度的区域磋商。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):e113-e122. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30003-2.
7
Resource-stratified implementation of a community-based breast cancer management programme in Peru.秘鲁实施基于社区的乳腺癌管理方案的资源分层策略。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):e607-e617. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30592-2.
8
Can reverse innovation catalyse better value health care?反向创新能否催生出更具价值的医疗保健?
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e967-e968. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30324-8.
9
The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health.女性癌症的全球负担:全球健康领域的一项重大挑战。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):847-860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
To adopt, to adapt, or to contextualise? The big question in clinical practice guideline development.采用、改编还是因地制宜?临床实践指南制定中的重大问题。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 13;9(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2244-7.

评估高收入、中等收入和低收入国家癌症筛查中的知识共享:来自国际癌症筛查网络的见解

Assessing Knowledge Sharing in Cancer Screening Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: Insights From the International Cancer Screening Network.

作者信息

Puricelli Perin Douglas M, Vogel Amanda L, Taplin Stephen H

机构信息

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.

Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.

出版信息

J Glob Oncol. 2019 Sep;5:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00202.

DOI:10.1200/JGO.19.00202
PMID:31584835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6825252/
Abstract

PURPOSE

As the global burden of cancer rises, global knowledge sharing of effective cancer control practices will be critical. The International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN) of the US National Cancer Institute facilitates knowledge sharing to advance cancer screening research and practice. Our analysis assessed perceptions of ICSN's value and knowledge sharing in cancer screening among participants working in high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

In 2018, the National Cancer Institute fielded a self-administered, online survey to 665 ICSN participants from both HICs and LMICs.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-three individuals (36.5%) completed the full survey. LMIC participants engaged in more diverse screening activities and had fewer years of experience (13.5% with more than 20 years of experience 31%; = .048) in screening and were more interested in cervical cancer (76.9% 52.6%; = .002) than HIC participants. However, both groups spent most of their time on research (30.8% LMIC 36.6% HIC; = .518) and agreed that the ICSN biennial meeting enabled them to learn from the experiences of both higher-resource (88.2% 75.7%; = .122) and lower-resource (61.8% 68.0%; = .507) settings. ICSN helped them form new collaborations for research and implementation (55.1% 58.2%; = .063); informed advances in research/evaluation (71.4% 68.0%; = .695), implementation (59.2% 47.9%; = .259), and policies in their settings (55.1% 48.0%; = .425); and provided the opportunity to contribute their knowledge and expertise to assist others (67.3% 71.1%; = .695).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that HIC and LMIC participants benefit from knowledge sharing at ICSN meetings although their interests, backgrounds, and needs differ. This points to the importance of international research networks that are inclusive of HIC and LMIC participants in cancer control to advance knowledge and effective practices globally.

摘要

目的

随着全球癌症负担的增加,有效癌症控制实践的全球知识共享将至关重要。美国国立癌症研究所的国际癌症筛查网络(ICSN)促进知识共享,以推进癌症筛查研究和实践。我们的分析评估了高收入国家(HICs)和低收入及中等收入国家(LMICs)的参与者对ICSN在癌症筛查方面的价值和知识共享的看法。

方法

2018年,国立癌症研究所对来自HICs和LMICs的665名ICSN参与者进行了一项自我管理的在线调查。

结果

243人(36.5%)完成了完整调查。与HIC参与者相比,LMIC参与者参与的筛查活动更多样化,筛查经验年限更少(13.5%有超过20年经验对31%;P = 0.048),对宫颈癌更感兴趣(76.9%对52.6%;P = 0.002)。然而,两组大部分时间都花在研究上(LMIC为30.8%,HIC为36.6%;P = 0.518),并且都认为ICSN两年一次的会议使他们能够从资源更丰富(88.2%对75.7%;P = 0.122)和资源较少(61.8%对68.0%;P = 0.507)的环境中学习经验。ICSN帮助他们形成新的研究和实施合作(55.1%对58.2%;P = 0.063);为其所在环境中的研究/评估(71.4%对68.0%;P = 0.695)、实施(59.2%对47.9%;P = 0.259)和政策(55.1%对48.0%;P = 0.425)的进展提供信息;并提供了贡献其知识和专业技能以帮助他人的机会(67.3%对71.1%;P = 0.695)。

结论

研究结果表明,尽管HIC和LMIC参与者的兴趣、背景和需求不同,但他们都从ICSN会议的知识共享中受益。这表明了包括HIC和LMIC参与者在内进行癌症控制方面的国际研究网络对于在全球推进知识和有效实践的重要性。