Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, the Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1646-1650. doi: 10.1002/lary.28328. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
To determine the accuracy of the minimum leak test as a surrogate for target endotracheal cuff pressure of 20-30 cm H O in intubated patients.
Cuff pressures were measured at the University of Miami Hospital using the minimum leak test on every intubated patient once per shift, then cuff pressure was reevaluated using handheld numerical manometers and recorded pressures above or below the target range, readjusting the pressure as needed. This assessment was repeated throughout each patient's intubation for up to 6 days. The readjustment rate of the test and the probability of a patient needing at least one adjustment were determined.
One hundred twenty-two patients were evaluated. Median age was 67 years (range 29-95), 52% were male, 48% were female. Patients were followed for an average of 4.7 days. Seven hundred twenty-two minimum leak tests were performed. Of these, 170 required readjustment into the target range (24% readjustment rate). Of the tests outside target range, 66% of cuffs were overinflated and 34% were underinflated. Fifty-five percent of patients required at least one adjustment.
Despite ubiquitous use of the minimum leak test for endotracheal cuff pressure adjustment, the test has an unacceptably high error rate resulting in cuff pressures above or below the target range. Most patients will require at least one adjustment throughout an intubation, putting them at risk for tracheal injury, stenosis, or leak and aspiration. The minimum leak test is not sufficiently accurate for endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring. Formal manometry is superior and should be used to optimize patient outcomes.
4 Laryngoscope, 130:1646-1650, 2020.
确定最小漏气测试作为插管患者目标气管套囊压力 20-30cmH2O 的替代指标的准确性。
在迈阿密大学医院,使用最小漏气测试对每个班次的每位插管患者进行一次套囊压力测量,然后使用手持数字压力计重新评估套囊压力,并记录高于或低于目标范围的压力,根据需要调整压力。在每个患者的插管过程中,都会重复进行这项评估,最长可达 6 天。确定测试的调整率和患者至少需要一次调整的概率。
共评估了 122 名患者。中位年龄为 67 岁(范围 29-95 岁),52%为男性,48%为女性。患者平均随访 4.7 天。共进行了 722 次最小漏气测试。其中,170 次需要调整到目标范围(调整率 24%)。在不在目标范围内的测试中,66%的套囊充气过度,34%的套囊充气不足。55%的患者至少需要一次调整。
尽管最小漏气测试广泛用于气管套囊压力调整,但该测试存在不可接受的高错误率,导致套囊压力高于或低于目标范围。大多数患者在整个插管过程中至少需要调整一次,使他们面临气管损伤、狭窄或泄漏和吸入的风险。最小漏气测试不能充分准确地监测气管套囊压力。正式的测压法更优越,应用于优化患者的治疗效果。
4 级 喉镜,130:1646-1650,2020 年。