Institute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn.
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 31;69(688):e786-e793. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706037. Print 2019 Nov.
Clinical judgement is intrinsic to diagnostic strategies in general practice; however, empirical evidence for its validity is sparse.
To ascertain whether a GP's global clinical judgement of future cognitive status has an added value for predicting a patient's likelihood of experiencing dementia.
Multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in German general practice that took place from January 2003 to October 2016.
Patients without baseline dementia were assessed with neuropsychological interviews over 12 years; 138 GPs rated the future cognitive decline of their participating patients. Associations of baseline predictors with follow-up incident dementia were analysed with mixed-effects logistic and Cox regression.
A total of 3201 patients were analysed over the study period (mean age = 79.6 years, 65.3% females, 6.7% incident dementia in 3 years, 22.1% incident dementia in 12 years). Descriptive analyses and comparison with other cohorts identified the participants as having frequent and long-lasting doctor-patient relationships and being well known to their GPs. The GP baseline rating of future cognitive decline had significant value for 3-year dementia prediction, independent of cognitive test scores and patient's memory complaints (GP ratings of very mild (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] = 1.28 to 3.04); mild (OR 3.00, 95% CI = 1.90 to 4.76); and moderate/severe decline (OR 5.66, 95% CI = 3.29 to 9.73)). GPs' baseline judgements were significantly associated with patients' 12-year dementia-free survival rates (Mantel-Cox log rank test <0.001).
In this sample of patients in familiar doctor-patient relationships, the GP's clinical judgement holds additional value for predicting dementia, complementing test performance and patients' self-reports. Existing and emerging primary care-based dementia risk models should consider the GP's judgement as one predictor. Results underline the importance of the GP-patient relationship.
临床判断是一般实践中诊断策略的固有组成部分;然而,其有效性的经验证据很少。
确定全科医生对未来认知状态的整体临床判断是否对预测患者发生痴呆的可能性具有附加价值。
这是一项 2003 年 1 月至 2016 年 10 月在德国普通实践中进行的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
在 12 年内,无基线痴呆的患者接受神经心理访谈评估;138 名全科医生对其参与患者的未来认知衰退进行了评估。使用混合效应逻辑和 Cox 回归分析基线预测因素与随访时发生痴呆的相关性。
在研究期间共分析了 3201 名患者(平均年龄=79.6 岁,65.3%为女性,3 年内发生痴呆的比例为 6.7%,12 年内发生痴呆的比例为 22.1%)。描述性分析和与其他队列的比较表明,参与者具有频繁且持久的医患关系,并且他们的全科医生非常了解他们。全科医生对未来认知衰退的基线评估对 3 年痴呆预测具有重要价值,独立于认知测试评分和患者的记忆主诉(全科医生的轻度评估(比值比 [OR] 1.97,95%置信区间 [95%CI] = 1.28 至 3.04);中度(OR 3.00,95%CI = 1.90 至 4.76);以及严重下降(OR 5.66,95%CI = 3.29 至 9.73))。全科医生的基线判断与患者 12 年无痴呆生存率显著相关(Mantel-Cox 对数秩检验<0.001)。
在这个熟悉的医患关系患者样本中,全科医生的临床判断对预测痴呆具有附加价值,补充了测试表现和患者的自我报告。现有的和新出现的基于初级保健的痴呆风险模型应将全科医生的判断作为一个预测因素。研究结果强调了医患关系的重要性。