• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于护士、助产士和专职医疗人员临床学术职业的挑战与益处的混合方法研究。

A mixed-methods study of challenges and benefits of clinical academic careers for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.

作者信息

Trusson Diane, Rowley Emma, Bramley Louise

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030595.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030595
PMID:31594886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6797317/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The clinical academic trajectory for doctors and dentists is well-established, with research embedded in their career development. Recent years have also seen a burgeoning interest and push for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) to pursue a clinical academic career. However, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 10-year review suggested that there may be problems with progression post Master's degree level for this group, with nurses and midwives receiving less NIHR funding than allied health professionals. This study responds to these concerns, tracking the progression and exploring experiences of NMAHPs in the East Midlands region of England.

DESIGN

An online survey and in-depth interviews were used to capture a wide range of experiences.

PARTICIPANTS

67 NMAHPs who were pursuing a clinical academic career were surveyed, supplemented by 16 semi-structured in-depth interviews.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged during data analysis: Embarking on a clinical academic career, overcoming barriers and benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

NMAHPs are motivated to pursue a clinical academic career by a drive to improve services for the benefit of patients and the National Health Service more widely, as well as for personal development and career progression. People working in these roles have opportunities to explore possible solutions to issues that they encounter in their clinical role through academic study. Findings reveal benefits emanating from the individual level through to (inter)national levels, therefore academic study should be encouraged and supported. However, investment is needed to establish more clinical academic roles to enable NMAHPs to continue to use their experience and expertise post-PhD, otherwise the full extent of their value will not be recognised.

摘要

目标

医生和牙医的临床学术发展轨迹已得到充分确立,研究融入其职业发展之中。近年来,护士、助产士和专职医疗人员(NMAHPs)对从事临床学术职业的兴趣也在迅速增长并受到推动。然而,英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)的十年审查表明,该群体在硕士学位之后的职业发展可能存在问题,护士和助产士获得的NIHR资金比专职医疗人员少。本研究回应了这些担忧,追踪了英格兰东米德兰兹地区NMAHPs的职业发展并探索了他们的经历。

设计

采用在线调查和深入访谈来获取广泛的经历。

参与者

对67名正在从事临床学术职业的NMAHPs进行了调查,并辅以16次半结构化深入访谈。

结果

数据分析过程中出现了三个主题:开启临床学术生涯、克服障碍和益处。

结论

NMAHPs追求临床学术职业的动机是渴望改善服务,以更广泛地造福患者和国民医疗服务体系,同时也是为了个人发展和职业晋升。从事这些工作的人有机会通过学术研究探索解决他们在临床工作中遇到的问题的可能方案。研究结果揭示了从个人层面到(跨)国家层面所产生的益处,因此应鼓励和支持学术研究。然而,需要进行投资以设立更多临床学术岗位,使NMAHPs在获得博士学位后能够继续运用他们的经验和专业知识,否则他们的全部价值将无法得到认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/c792265e99ad/bmjopen-2019-030595f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/c4d17c38472a/bmjopen-2019-030595f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/55952189c920/bmjopen-2019-030595f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/ceb0334925a5/bmjopen-2019-030595f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/c792265e99ad/bmjopen-2019-030595f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/c4d17c38472a/bmjopen-2019-030595f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/55952189c920/bmjopen-2019-030595f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/ceb0334925a5/bmjopen-2019-030595f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c39/6797317/c792265e99ad/bmjopen-2019-030595f04.jpg

相似文献

1
A mixed-methods study of challenges and benefits of clinical academic careers for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.一项关于护士、助产士和专职医疗人员临床学术职业的挑战与益处的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030595.
2
Multimethods study comparing the experiences of medical clinical academics with nurses, midwives and allied health professionals pursuing a clinical academic career.一项多方法研究,比较医学临床学者与从事临床学术职业的护士、助产士及专职医疗人员的经历。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043270.
3
Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A cross-sectional survey.护理、助产及相关健康专业临床学术职业发展的促进因素与障碍:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):406-416. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15673. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Capitalising on the transformational opportunities of early clinical academic career training for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.充分利用护士、助产士和 临床医生职业培训的变革机会。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02348-2.
5
Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.使用可见研究影响(VICTOR)问卷评估护士、助产士和联合健康专业人员奖学金计划的收益。
Nurse Res. 2023 Dec 7;31(4):30-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1864. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
A qualitative study exploring experiences and challenges of combining clinical academic training with family life.一项探索临床学术培训与家庭生活相结合的经验和挑战的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02849-8.
7
Boundary spanning and identity work in the clinical research delivery workforce: a qualitative study of research nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the National Health Service, United Kingdom.临床研究交付工作队伍中的跨界与身份认同工作:对英国国民医疗服务体系中研究护士、助产士和专职医疗专业人员的定性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 4;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00722-0.
8
Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master's degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey.评估硕士研究生水平的研究在联合健康专业中的感知影响和遗留问题:一项英国范围内的横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05582-0.
9
The role of Allied Health Professions and Nursing Research Internships in developing a research culture: a mixed-methods exploration of stakeholder perspectives.联合健康专业和护理研究实习在培养研究文化中的作用:对利益相关者观点的混合方法探索。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 19;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00638-1.
10
Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study.10 年英国国家卫生研究院研究培训:对项目的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):e046410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046410.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the research interest, capacity and culture of NHS staff in South-East Scotland and changes in attitudes to research following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a qualitative study.探索苏格兰东南部国民保健服务体系工作人员的研究兴趣、能力和文化以及在新冠疫情后对研究态度的变化:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13074-0.
2
The benefits for health care staff of involvement in applied health research: a scoping review.医疗保健人员参与应用健康研究的益处:一项范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 18;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01365-1.
3
The joys and frustrations of life as an embedded researcher: Findings from a diary study of researchers embedded within local authority public health teams in England.

本文引用的文献

1
Building clinical academic leadership capacity: sustainability through partnership.培养临床学术领导能力:通过合作实现可持续发展。
J Res Nurs. 2018 Jun;23(4):346-357. doi: 10.1177/1744987117748348. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities.未来的临床学术人才队伍:对英国两所研究密集型大学临床博士生职业决策影响因素的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e016823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823.
3
The NIHR at 10: transforming clinical research .
作为一名嵌入式研究人员的生活中的喜悦与挫折:对英格兰地方当局公共卫生团队中的嵌入式研究人员进行的日记研究结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0328996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328996. eCollection 2025.
4
Transforming the experience in nursing and midwifery research - Quarantine Research Time Program (QRTP).变革护理与助产研究体验——隔离研究时间计划(QRTP)。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 28;24(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03584-x.
5
Do Jointly Appointed Nursing and Midwifery Clinical Academics Provide Benefits to Patients, Individual Joint Appointees, Academic Institutions and Health and Social Care Organisations? A Scoping Literature Review.联合任命的护理与助产临床学者是否能为患者、个体联合任命人员、学术机构以及健康与社会护理组织带来益处?一项范围界定文献综述。
Nurs Open. 2025 May;12(5):e70227. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70227.
6
Differences in personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers: A cross-sectional study.职业治疗研究人员与非研究人员在人格和性格特征上的差异:一项横断面研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Apr;72(2):e70015. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70015.
7
Exploring resistance and avoidance behaviours at the research delivery, clinical practice interface: group concept mapping through a critical realist lens.探索研究实施与临床实践界面的抵抗和回避行为:基于批判实在论视角的群体概念映射
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 19:17449871241311536. doi: 10.1177/17449871241311536.
8
Operationalising routinely collected patient data in research to further the pursuit of social justice and health equity: a team-based scoping review.将常规收集的患者数据用于研究以促进社会正义和健康公平的实施:一项基于团队的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02466-9.
9
Assessing research culture and capacity amongst faculty at a north American chiropractic institution: an explanatory mixed methods study.评估北美整脊机构教师的研究文化和能力:一项解释性混合方法研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Nov 20;32(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00558-9.
10
The impact of a clinical academic nurse researcher in critical care: A 1-year service review.临床学术护理研究者在重症监护中的影响:为期一年的服务回顾。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1806-1814. doi: 10.1111/jan.16367. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
英国国家卫生研究院成立10周年:变革临床研究
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Dec;16(6):501-502. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-501.
4
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.