Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 12;14(1):370. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03042-3.
A decoupling between confidence and action could relate to compulsive behaviour as seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The link between confidence and action in OCD has been investigated in clinical case-control studies and in the general population with discrepant findings. The generalizability of findings from highly-compulsive general population samples to clinical OCD samples has been questioned. Here, we investigate action-confidence coupling for 38 OCD patients compared to 37 healthy controls (HC), using a predictive inference task. We compared those results to a comparison between matched high and low compulsive individuals from the general population. Action-updating, confidence and their coupling were compared between the groups. Moreover, computational modeling was performed to compare groups on error sensitivity and environmental parameters. OCD patients showed lower confidence and higher learning rates in reaction to (small) prediction errors than HC, signaling hyperactive error signaling and lower confidence estimation. No evidence was found for differences in action-confidence coupling between groups. In contrast high the compulsive group showed higher confidence and stronger decoupling than the low compulsive group, both of which were related to symptoms. The underlying mechanisms of obsessive-compulsive behaviour might differ between clinical and highly-compulsive general population samples, resulting in different (meta)cognitive profiles.
信心与行动之间的脱节可能与强迫症(OCD)中观察到的强迫行为有关。在临床病例对照研究和一般人群中已经研究了 OCD 中信心与行动之间的联系,但研究结果存在差异。从高度强迫的一般人群样本中得出的发现对临床 OCD 样本的普遍性一直存在质疑。在这里,我们使用预测推理任务比较了 38 名 OCD 患者与 37 名健康对照(HC)之间的行为-信心耦合。我们将这些结果与来自一般人群的匹配高和低强迫个体之间的比较进行了比较。比较了两组之间的行为更新、信心及其耦合。此外,还进行了计算建模,以比较组之间的错误敏感性和环境参数。与 HC 相比,OCD 患者对(小)预测错误的反应表现出较低的信心和更高的学习率,表明过度活跃的错误信号和较低的信心估计。组间未发现行为-信心耦合的差异。相反,高强迫组表现出比低强迫组更高的信心和更强的脱钩,这两者都与症状有关。强迫症行为的潜在机制可能在临床和高度强迫的一般人群样本之间有所不同,导致不同的(元)认知特征。