Fleischmann Roy, Weinblatt Michael, Ahmad Harris, Maldonado Michael A, Alemao Evo, Ye June, Schiff Michael
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Dec;6(4):559-571. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-00174-7. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors, such as seropositivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and early erosions, may benefit from early intensive treatment. However, information to guide physicians on the best choice of therapy in these patients is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab over 2 years in patients with seropositive, erosive early RA in the AMPLE study.
This exploratory post hoc analysis compared clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes in two subsets of patients: patients with early RA (≤ 6 months' disease duration) who were seropositive for rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and had > 1 radiographic erosion (Cohort 1); and patients with RA and absence of ≥ 1 of these inclusion criteria (Cohort 2).
Of the 646 randomized patients, Cohort 1 included 38 patients receiving abatacept and 45 receiving adalimumab, and Cohort 2 included 280 patients receiving abatacept and 283 receiving adalimumab. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups in both cohorts. Over 2 years, in Cohort 1, the adjusted mean change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (using C-reactive protein) was numerically greater for abatacept than for adalimumab (mean difference at day 365 was 0.9, 95% confidence interval - 1.47 to - 0.33). Similar patterns of improvement were observed for other disease activity measures and physical function, but not for radiographic outcomes. No treatment-related differences were observed in Cohort 2.
This analysis indicates a trend towards improved disease activity and physical function with abatacept versus adalimumab in patients with seropositive, erosive early RA.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929864.
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者若存在抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体血清阳性和早期骨侵蚀等预后不良因素,早期强化治疗可能有益。然而,指导医生为这些患者选择最佳治疗方案的信息有限。本研究的目的是在AMPLE研究中描述皮下注射阿巴西普与阿达木单抗治疗血清阳性、有侵蚀性的早期RA患者2年的疗效。
这项探索性事后分析比较了两个患者亚组的临床、功能和影像学结局:类风湿因子和/或抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体血清阳性、有>1处影像学骨侵蚀且疾病病程≤6个月的早期RA患者(队列1);以及不符合这些纳入标准中任何一项的RA患者(队列2)。
在646例随机分组的患者中,队列1包括38例接受阿巴西普治疗的患者和45例接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者,队列2包括280例接受阿巴西普治疗的患者和283例接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者。两个队列中治疗组之间的基线人口统计学和疾病特征总体相似。在2年期间,在队列1中,使用C反应蛋白的28个关节疾病活动评分从基线的调整后平均变化,阿巴西普在数值上大于阿达木单抗(第365天的平均差异为0.9,95%置信区间为-1.47至-0.33)。在其他疾病活动指标和身体功能方面观察到类似的改善模式,但在影像学结局方面未观察到。在队列2中未观察到与治疗相关的差异。
该分析表明,在血清阳性、有侵蚀性的早期RA患者中,与阿达木单抗相比,阿巴西普在改善疾病活动和身体功能方面有一定趋势。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929864。
百时美施贵宝公司。