Latif Z, Gates D, Wust C J, Brown A
J Gen Virol. 1979 Oct;45(1):89-98. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-45-1-89.
After immunization with Sindbis virus, T-cell deficient nude mice, compared to normal littermates, were equally protected against challenge with Sindbis virus. However, the nude mice showed about one-tenth the protection observed with normal littermates after challenge with Semliki Forest virus at a dose of 100 LD50. This consistent with our previous interpretation that sensitized T-cell populations play a major role in cross protection between the two togaviruses. The remaining low level of specific cross protection in nude mice (detectable only at a challenge dose of 10 LD50) could not be attributed to an anamnestic response of neutralizing antibody to the challenge virus or to an effective antibody-dependent, complement-mediated cytolysis of infected cells in vivo. Other possible compensatory mechanisms to explain the low level of specific cross protection in nude mice are discussed.
用辛德毕斯病毒免疫后,与正常同窝小鼠相比,T细胞缺陷的裸鼠对辛德毕斯病毒攻击具有同等程度的保护作用。然而,在用100个半数致死剂量的Semliki森林病毒攻击后,裸鼠表现出的保护作用约为正常同窝小鼠的十分之一。这与我们之前的解释一致,即致敏T细胞群体在这两种披膜病毒之间的交叉保护中起主要作用。裸鼠中剩余的低水平特异性交叉保护(仅在10个半数致死剂量的攻击剂量下可检测到)不能归因于针对攻击病毒的中和抗体的回忆反应,也不能归因于体内感染细胞的有效抗体依赖性补体介导的细胞溶解。本文讨论了其他可能解释裸鼠中低水平特异性交叉保护的补偿机制。